01.05.2013 Views

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 Kant's Reading of Biology<br />

not been able to mate and produce fertile progeny with members of<br />

other varieties. Such varieties must, according to Buffon, have had a<br />

common origin, even though they possess different hereditary<br />

traits. The original species must have split up into lineages or races<br />

which transmit hereditarily their distinguishing characteristic<br />

traits. In such races new characters have arisen which apparently<br />

can be transmitted in generation. Furthermore, some of these<br />

hereditary traits seemed clearly to be purposive adaptations to the<br />

environment. Thus the question arose: How can new purposive<br />

properties be added to an organizational form in such a way as to be<br />

passed on in generation?<br />

The empirical phenomenon that occasioned and was used to<br />

illustrate this general question of biological theory can be sketched<br />

rather briefly: Black Africans and white Europeans can mate and<br />

produce fertile progeny who bear traits from both sides and pass<br />

these traits on; both races thus belong to the same biological species.<br />

Although white Europeans (the Portuguese) who have been living in<br />

Africa for 200 years are burned brown by the sun, their children are<br />

at birth just as white as those born in Europe; the darker color of the<br />

skin is not inherited. The black Africans brought to Europe have not<br />

grown pale in the European climate; they transmit their dark skin<br />

unchanged. Since both races have a common descent (and since the<br />

common ancestor is supposed to have been somewhat similar to the<br />

present Europeans, 24 the Africans must at some time have become<br />

black. Kant also assumes that dark skin is a useful adaptation to the<br />

climate of the tropics. The question is thus: How could the Africans<br />

adapt themselves to the tropics? Why don't the Europeans today do<br />

the same? And why don't the Africans become white (again) in<br />

Europe? Or more generally: How can the environment occasion<br />

heritable adaptations, and why can't they be reversed?<br />

Since he doubts that the laws of mechanics can explain the<br />

first origin of organic structures, Kant assumes a — somewhat<br />

indeterminate — original organization. If one assumes that the<br />

environment can change the hereditary organization by acting<br />

mechanically upon it, then there is no reason why it should not in<br />

24 Kant may well be the only European thinker of his time who seriously considered<br />

that the white European might not necessarily be the prototype of the species<br />

and that whites and blacks might be descended from a common ancestor that no<br />

longer exists. Nonetheless, he believed as an "empirical" hypothesis that the<br />

original stock was "white and brown haired." (W 6,28; Ak 2,441)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!