01.05.2013 Views

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

KANT'S CRITIQUE OF TELEOLOGY IN BIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Theory of the Organism<br />

not in any case be studied by natural science, everything is<br />

explained by purely mechanical laws of matter. As Leibniz, who<br />

sided with animalculism, put it: 9<br />

As for the motions of the celestial bodies and even the formation of plants<br />

and animals, there is nothing in them that looks like a miracle except their<br />

beginning. The organism of animals is a mechanism which supposes a<br />

divine preformation. What follows upon it is purely natural and entirely<br />

mechanical.<br />

One peculiarity about the teleology used in the preformation<br />

theory as well as in deistic systems in general should be noted: It is<br />

the same kind of teleology, the same kind of reconciliation of mechanism<br />

and teleology, that take places in every process of manufacture<br />

or material production. A plan or an idea of the object to be produced<br />

guides the otherwise mechanical production, and a divine artisan is<br />

introduced who conceives the plan and executes it. However, the<br />

question of why the divine watchmaker chose to build the world<br />

machine — whether to play the music of the spheres or otherwise to<br />

provide for entertainment — is completely irrelevant to science; this<br />

is a purely theological question. Final causes in the strict sense are<br />

excluded from science and from its metaphysics. As Descartes put<br />

it: 10<br />

And so finally concerning natural things, we shall not undertake any<br />

reasonings from the end which God or nature set himself in creating these<br />

things, [and we shall entirely reject from our philosophy the search for final<br />

causes] because we ought not to presume so much of ourselves as to think<br />

that we are the confidants of his intentions.<br />

Nonetheless, teleology in a more general sense is not completely<br />

excluded. Of the four aspects of the causal nexus traditionally<br />

distinguished in philosophy — the efficient, the material, the<br />

formal, and the final — only the causa finalis has been banished<br />

from science and its metaphysical foundations. The causality of the<br />

form, causa formalis, or the plan that the artisan God stamps onto<br />

matter is admitted. 11 The teleology of the mechanistic systems<br />

consists entirely in the causa formalis, in the plan of the watch that<br />

the artisan designed before implementing it in the world.<br />

9 Leibniz, 5th letter to Clarke, §115.<br />

10 Descartes, Principia, part I, §28; AT VIII,15-16. The clause in brackets was<br />

added in the French edition.<br />

11 Hobbes, too, excludes final causes but counts the causa formalis as an efficient<br />

cause; cf. De Corpore, II, 10, §7, Opera I, 117.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!