19.06.2013 Views

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pre-print Volume – Posters<br />

Topic 3: INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT<br />

Tab. 1 - Values of EQR for Posidonia oceanica meadows. Density=shoots m -2 ; SLsurface=Shoot<br />

Leaf surface (cm 2 shoot -1 ); LLdepth=Lowel Limit depth (m); Type=type of limit.<br />

Valori di EQR relativi alle praterie di Posidonia oceanica. Densità=fasci m -2 ;<br />

SLsurface=Superficie foliare per fascio (cm 2 fascio -1 ); LLdepth=profondità del limite<br />

inferiore (m); Type=Tipo di limite.<br />

Location EQR’density EQR’SL<br />

surface<br />

41 st S.I.B.M. CONGRESS Rapallo (GE), 7-11 June 2010<br />

179<br />

EQR’LLdepth EQR’type EQR<br />

Piombino 0.77 (good) 0.81 (high) 0.36 (moderate) 0.44 (moderate) 0.60 (good)<br />

Livorno 0.62 (good) 0.64 (good) 0.44 (moderate) 0.89 (high) 0.65(good)<br />

Tab. 2 - Values of ecological status of 3 locations of Tuscany coasts obtained with the use of different<br />

biological indicators.<br />

Valori relativi allo stato ecologico delle tre località della costa toscana ottenuti con tramite<br />

l'applicazione di diversi indicatori biologici.<br />

Location EQR<br />

P. oceanica<br />

meadows<br />

EQR<br />

Macroalgal<br />

assemblages<br />

EQR<br />

coralligenous<br />

assemblages<br />

EQR Ecological<br />

status<br />

Monte Argentario - 0.96 (high) 0.92 (high) 0.925 High<br />

Piombino 0.60 (good) 0.71 (good) - 0.670 Good<br />

Livorno 0.65 (good) 0.69 (good) 0.74 (good) 0.716 Good<br />

Conclusions –The present paper allowed to compare values of ecological quality of<br />

coastal water obtained through the use of different biological indicators and to evaluate<br />

the effectiveness of the concurrent study of more habitats to determine the ecological<br />

status of a determinate water body. This approach is important in relation to the high<br />

variability of natural systems and the possibility that differences among assemblages<br />

could be due to causes others than anthropogenic disturbance. A synthesis of results<br />

obtained through a higher number of indicators may allow to make adequate<br />

comparisons. An interesting result of the study was a general correspondence among<br />

values of different indicators.<br />

References<br />

BALLESTEROS E., TORRAS X., PINEDO S., GARCIA M., MANGIALAJO L., DE TORRES M.<br />

(2006) – A new methodology based on littoral community cartography dominated by macroalgae<br />

for the implementation of the European Framework Directive. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 55: 172-180.<br />

CECCHI E., PIAZZI L. (2010) – A new method for the assessment of the ecological status of<br />

coralligenous assemblages. Biol. Mar. Mediterr., 17 (1): (submitted)<br />

LOPEZ Y ROJO C., CASAZZA G., PERGENT-MARTINI C., PERGENT G. (2010) – A biotic<br />

index using the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (BiPo), to evaluate ecological status of coastal<br />

waters. Ecol. Indicators, 10: 380-389.<br />

MANGIALAJO L., RUGGIERI N., ASNAGHI V,. CHIANTORE M,. POVERO P., CATTANEO-<br />

VIETTI R. (2007) – Ecological status in the Ligurian Sea: the effect of coastline urbanization<br />

and the importance of proper reference sites. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 55: 30-41.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!