19.06.2013 Views

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pre-print Volume –Oral presentations<br />

Topic 4: THE ELASMOBRANCHS<br />

Tab. 2 – GSA 17, fishermen interviews. Percentage contribution of Elasmobranchs to the total catch<br />

over time.<br />

GSA 17, interviste ai pescatori. Variazione nel tempo del contributo percentuale degli<br />

elasmobranchi alle catture totali.<br />

Mean % Elasmobranch<br />

contribution to the total catch<br />

From 1940’s<br />

to 1960’s<br />

From 1960’s<br />

to 1980’s<br />

41 st S.I.B.M. CONGRESS Rapallo (GE), 7-11 June 2010<br />

213<br />

From 1980’s to<br />

present<br />

12.7 (±11.3) 10.9 (±6.3) 5.8 (± 4.7)<br />

As concerns single species, from 1960’s a notable decrease of species like Squalus spp.<br />

and Raja spp was reported. In some cases also a decrease of Mustelus spp. was noticed.<br />

The latest abundant catches of Squalus spp. were reported until the middle of 1970’s.<br />

Conclusions - The results of the interviews performed in both areas closely agreed in<br />

showing a decrease in the catches of elasmobranchs over time. This reduction has been<br />

noticed particularly for some species like Mustelus spp., Squalus spp. and Squatina<br />

spp. As a matter of fact, these species have been included as critically endangered,<br />

endangered or vulnerable species in the IUCN red lists (Cavangh and Gibson, 2007). In<br />

many cases it was reported their complete disappearance. It seems that species like<br />

Mustelus spp. were notably more abundant at the beginning of last Century and in<br />

some areas, as in GSA9, where they were also targets of a specific fishery, until<br />

1960’s. In certain areas, however, an evident decrease of elasmobranchs was already<br />

observed immediately after the Second World War.<br />

Even though these results can be qualified as anecdotal or lacking of scientific value,<br />

this anthropological information could contribute to improve the historical picture of<br />

the fisheries and associated fish communities. On the other hand, the results obtained<br />

from the interviews are validated by several researches and scientific papers (e.g.<br />

Aldebert, 1997; Ferretti et al., 2008).<br />

References<br />

ALDEBERT Y. (1997) – Demersal resources of the Gulf of Lion (NW Mediterranean). Impact of<br />

exploitation on fish diversity. Vie Milieu, 47 (4): 275-284<br />

BERGMANN M., HINZ H., BLYTH R., KAISER M.J., ROGERS S.I., ARMSTRONG M.J. (2004) -<br />

Using knowledge from fishers and fisheries scientists to identify possible roundfish 'Essential<br />

Fish Habitats'. Fish. Res., 66: 373–379.<br />

CAVANGH R.D., GIBSON C. (2007) - Overview of the Conservation Status of Cartilaginous Fishes<br />

(Chondrichthyans) in the Mediterranean Sea. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Malaga, Spain. Vi<br />

+ 42 pp.<br />

FERRETTI F, MYERS R.A., SERENA F., LOTZE H.K. (2008) - Loss of large predatory sharks from<br />

the Mediterranean Sea. Conserv. Biol., 22 (4): 952 -964.<br />

FREIRE J., GARCÍA-ALLUT A. (1999) - Integration of fishers’ ecological knowledge in fisheries<br />

biology and management. A proposal for the case of the artisanal coastal fisheries of Galicia<br />

(NW Spain) ICES CM 1999/S: 07.<br />

SARDÀ F, MAYNOU F (1998) - Assessing perceptions: do Catalan fishermen catch more shrimp on<br />

Fridays?. Fish. Res. 36:149-157.<br />

SARTOR P. (2010) – The 20 th Century evolution of Mediterranean exploited demersal resources<br />

under increasing fishing disturbance and environmental change. EU EVOMED project, Interim<br />

Report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!