19.06.2013 Views

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pre-print Volume - Posters<br />

BENTHOS COMMITEE<br />

Tab. 1 - Octopus vulgaris: data of the specimens recaptured (*tags recovered in trammel nets).<br />

Octopus vulgaris: dati relativi agli individui ricatturati (*marche rinvenute nei tramagli).<br />

Specimens<br />

Code<br />

Weight at<br />

release (g)<br />

Weight at<br />

recapture (g)<br />

DF Sex<br />

Maturity<br />

stage<br />

SGR<br />

Straight distance from release<br />

to recapture (meters)<br />

146 600 900 25 Male 3 0.0162 520<br />

213 520 600 8 Male 3 0.0179 1200<br />

238 259 400 12 Male 3 0.0241 1200<br />

204 329 455 20 Female 1 0.0162 20<br />

183 620 620 18 Male 4 0.0000 1200<br />

223 470 460 20 Male 4 -0.0011 510<br />

180 390 370 30 Male 4 -0.0018 510<br />

191 690 630 30 Male 4 -0.0030 1200<br />

196 590 530 30 Male 4 -0.0036 1200<br />

157* 700 - 42 Male - - 616<br />

163* 1000 - 42 Male - - 411<br />

Conclusions – The low number of recaptures highlights the need to carry out this kind<br />

of experiment in fishing banned areas, probably with greater success. This could also<br />

avoid that specimens tagged may lose their tag in an attempt to wriggle by the nets, as<br />

we have observed. However, even if preliminary, our data are the first for the<br />

Mediterranean. The SGRs recorded are in agreement with the high rates of growth and<br />

within the large variability of this species, as well as zero or negative rates are due the<br />

weight loss linked with the senescence (Domain et al., 2000). The recorded movements<br />

do not seem linked with days of freedom but could be due to available food, and or to<br />

the need to choose safe shelters where to spend daylight hours. However, they suggest<br />

for the species, a more sedentary behavior in our area than that reported for Japan Sea<br />

(48 km, see Nagasawa et al., 1993).<br />

References<br />

DOMAIN F., JOUFFRE D., CAVERIVIÈRE A. (2000) - Growth of Octopus vulgaris from tagging<br />

in Senegalese waters. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 80: 699-705.<br />

GUERRA A. (1992) - Mollusca, Cephalopoda. In: Ramos M.A., Alba J., Bellés X., Gosálbez J.,<br />

Guerra A., Macpherson E., Martín F., Serrano J., Templado J. (eds), Fauna Iberica, vol. 1.<br />

Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid: 235-236.<br />

NAGASAWA K., TAKAYANAGI S., TAKAMI T. (1993) - Cephalopod tagging and marking in<br />

Japan: a review. In: Okutani T., O’Dor R.K., Kubodera T. (eds), Recent Advances in Fisheries<br />

Biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo: 313-329.<br />

SEMMENS J.M., PECL G.T., VILLANUEVA R., JOUFFRE D., SOBRINO I., WOOD J.B., RIGBY<br />

P.R. (2004) - Understanding octopus growth: patterns, variability and physiology. Mar. Freshw.<br />

Res., 55: 367-377.<br />

SILVA L., SOBRINO I., RAMOS F. (2002) - Reproductive biology of the common Octopus,<br />

Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain).<br />

Bull. Mar. Sci., 71 (2): 837-850.<br />

41 st S.I.B.M. CONGRESS Rapallo (GE), 7-11 June 2010<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!