19.06.2013 Views

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pre-print Volume - Oral presentations<br />

Topic 1: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION SCIENCE: CONTRIBUTING TO MANAGEMENT<br />

G. GATTI, M. MONTEFALCONE, V. PARRAVICINI, C. MORRI, M. CHIANTORE, C.N. BIANCHI<br />

DipTeRis, Department for the study of the Territory and its Resources, University of Genoa,<br />

Corso Europa, 26 - 16132 Genoa, Italy.<br />

gatti.giulia25@gmail.com<br />

MONITORING THE “ISOLA DI BERGEGGI” MARINE<br />

PROTECTED AREA: A COMPARISON BETWEEN<br />

POINT INTERCEPT TRANSECTS AND VISUAL QUADRATS<br />

IL MONITORAGGIO DELL'AREA MARINA PROTETTA<br />

“ISOLA DI BERGEGGI”: POINT INTERCEPT TRANSECTS<br />

E QUADRATI VISUALI A CONFRONTO<br />

Abstract – Differences between two visual sampling methods, Point Intercept Transects (PITs) and Visual<br />

Quadrats, were investigated on hard bottom subtidal benthic assemblages in the “Isola di Bergeggi” MPA<br />

(Ligurian Sea). Results showed that PITs detect differences among sites better than quadrats.<br />

Key-words: quadrat, PIT, Marine Protected Area, hard bottom, Mediterranean Sea.<br />

Introduction – Monitoring activities were carried out in 2009 in the “Isola di<br />

Bergeggi” MPA (Ligurian Sea, NW Mediterranean), instituted in 2007 (D.M.<br />

7/5/2007), aiming to evaluate the condition of hard bottom assemblages. During the<br />

kick off of these activities we sampled benthic assemblages using two visual methods<br />

that enable to survey areas of different size, in order to compare their performance<br />

when investigating differences among sites and zones subjected to a distinct protection<br />

regime and to assess the most efficient method for monitoring a MPA.<br />

Materials and methods – Surveys were carried out in May 2009 in a total of six sites:<br />

two in zone A (Sites 5, 6), two in zone B (Sites 3, 7) and two in zone C (Sites 1, 2) at<br />

5 m depth (Fig. 1). Two visual methods were applied for sampling benthic<br />

assemblages: the Point Intercept Transect (PIT) and the Visual Quadrat (Bianchi et al.,<br />

2004). Three 10 m long replicates of PITs and six replicates of quadrats (50 cm x<br />

50 cm) were examined, totalling 18 PITs and 36 quadrats. Data from quadrats were<br />

collected either as percent cover and relative frequency.<br />

PIT and quadrat cover and frequency data for each species (or higher ranked taxon)<br />

were used to calculate Bray Curtis Similarity and compared using multivariate analyses<br />

(Multidimentional Scaling, SIMPER) to investigate similarity among sites. On the<br />

basis of the number of species (or taxa) obtained in each replicate the Dispersion<br />

Coefficient was computed, in order to analyse effects of the size of sampling area on<br />

the dispersion between replicates.<br />

Results – The comparison between PITs and quadrats shows small differences in the<br />

number of species detected (PITs: 48 species; quadrats: 52 species). The MDS plot<br />

41 st S.I.B.M. CONGRESS Rapallo (GE), 7-11 June 2010<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!