27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Adelua Olajide Olawole and Maruff Akinwale Oladejo<br />

accept the modern medium of information dissemination. Attitudes towards technology can therefore<br />

predict the electronic usage or otherwise by students with disabilities.<br />

Also, Computer Self-Efficacy (CSE) has been identified as another psychological factor that can<br />

determine students with disabilities’ eLearning usage. According to ( Bandura 1986: p. 391), general<br />

self-efficacy (GSE) refers to "people's judgments of their capabilities to organize and execute courses<br />

of action required to attain designated types of performance". The concept of computer self-efficacy<br />

emerged from the general self-efficacy literature. Computer Self-Efficacy (CSE) therefore according to<br />

(Compeau & Higgins 1995), measures one’s confidence in mastering a new technology or software<br />

with certain degree of confidence. Also, (Stephens & Shotick 2001), opined that computer selfefficacy<br />

is an individuals’ beliefs in their ability to use technology in order to solve problems, make<br />

decisions, and to gather and disseminate information. Also, (Foucher and Prince 2003) argued that in<br />

the field of eLearning, students who decide to use the inter system have a sense of self-efficacy<br />

higher than those who choose not to use the system.<br />

Furthermore, how technological confident one is, needs to be considered while discussing electronic<br />

usage. This is because the technological confidence of one has been reported to be a determinant of<br />

electronic usage (Akinniyi, 2010). In fact, (Akinniyi 2010) established that individual’s technological<br />

confidence is positively and significantly related to such individual’s eLearning adoption and usage<br />

(r=.023). The Researchers were therefore inclined to examine further, the relationship that exists<br />

between these psycho-social variables with respect to students with disabilities’ eLearning usage,<br />

which appears to have received little attention in Nigeria. This becomes highly important because<br />

attention now shifts to inclusive educational system, whereby students with or without disabilities<br />

receive instructions in regular educational Institutions.<br />

1.3 Statement of the problem<br />

The issue of acceptance of eLearning technology by learners has attracted many researchers in<br />

information systems. However, it appears that only few research have investigated the influence of<br />

psycho-social factors on the acceptance and usage of eLearning technology by students with<br />

disabilities in Nigeria. Hence, the problem of this study is to examine the predictive power of some<br />

psycho-social factors on eLearning usage by students with disabilities in Nigeria. To this end, the<br />

following research questions and null hypotheses were answered and tested in the study:<br />

Research Question 1: To what extent would the selected factors namely gender, nature of disability,<br />

computer self-efficacy, technological confidence and attitude towards technology, when taken<br />

together, predict the eLearning usage of students with disabilities in Nigeria?<br />

Research Question 2: What are the relative contributions of each of the selected factors to the<br />

prediction of eLearning usage of students with disabilities in Nigeria?<br />

Hypothesis 1: There is no significant gender difference in eLearning usage of students with<br />

disabilities in Nigeria.<br />

Hypothesis 2: There is no significant difference in eLearning usage of students with disabilities based<br />

on the nature of disability in Nigeria.<br />

2. Methodology<br />

2.1 Design<br />

The adopted research design for the present study is the descriptive survey which is “ex-post facto” in<br />

nature. An “ex-post facto “study according to a scholar is described as :<br />

A systematic empirical inquiry in which the scientist does<br />

not have direct control of independent variables because their<br />

manifestations have already occurred or because they are inherently<br />

not manipulable. Inferences about relations among variables are made<br />

without direct interaction from concomitant variation of independent and<br />

dependent variable, Kerlinger (in Oladejo, 2010: 264).<br />

603

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!