27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6. Results and analysis<br />

Fabio Serenelli et al.<br />

Here we present some results, even if the analysis phase is still ongoing. In fact we still have to run<br />

the evaluation of the UX questionnaires, and the correlation between learning performances and<br />

students engagement. In our further analysis we’ll proceed splitting the sample into two age groups:<br />

11-12 years old subjects “pre-adolescents” attending the 6th grade of primary school; and 13-14<br />

years old “adolescents” attending the 6th grade of primary school (that means that these pupils has<br />

been repeating one or two years during their school curriculum). Hereinafter some preliminary<br />

considerations are following to comment the results of the two main tests (Comprehension Test and<br />

Problem Solving Test; Transfer Test provides their mean general measure). We decided not to<br />

consider the Retention Test (pr=0.7629; see Table 8***) and the comparison between Problem<br />

Solving Test and the Problem Solving Delayed Test.<br />

Table 8: Analisys of variance<br />

Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)<br />

Retention 4 0.1138 0.028458 2.1348 0.07629***<br />

Comprehension 4 0.550 0.13750 3.5667 0.007286<br />

Problem_Solving 4 1.4106 0.35264 4.8926 0.0007658<br />

Transfer 4 0.7045 0.17612 4.0526 0.003207<br />

Table 9: Performance averages relating to the setting and to the LO<br />

CS1=<br />

CS2=<br />

CS3=<br />

CS4=<br />

CS5=<br />

LO1/SET-A LO2/SET-A LO3/SET-A LO3/SET-B LO4/SET-C<br />

Comprehension 0,44 0,530 0,535 0,475 0,442<br />

Problem_Solving 0,365 0,562 0,467 0,513 0,50<br />

Transfer 0,403 0,546 0,501 0,494 0,473<br />

Figure 5: Average performance for each experimental condition (CS)<br />

Comprehension Test: performances on concepts understanding tasks and concepts application tasks<br />

are higher in Self-Directed Learning using the laptop (Setting A), regardless of LO formats. In fact the<br />

results between the Learning-Game and the Multimedia Step by Step (LO2 and LO3) are comparable.<br />

Probably the use of the laptop with earphones allows a strong reduction from distractions in the<br />

classroom and increases the focus on relevant information. Both the Teacher-Directed (LO4/Setting<br />

C) and the Infographic Resume (LO1/Setting A) conditions are not recommended to study the food<br />

950

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!