27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chien-hwa Wang and Cheng-ping Chen<br />

shared construction of knowledge, which is an essential attribute of Web 2.0. Unfortunately, there are<br />

few studies of Web 2.0 learning that focus on learner characteristics. Vandewaetere, Desmet and<br />

Clarebout (2011) also highlighted that current studies on adaptive learning failed to bridge theory with<br />

practice. Therefore, a framework that integrates current and past research results is urgent.<br />

4. Self-directed learning readiness (SDLR)<br />

In a promising development, Hung et al. (2010) verified a five dimensional model of learner<br />

characteristics for online learning environments. The five dimensions were categorized as: selfdirected<br />

learning (SDL), motivation for learning, computer/Internet self-efficacy, and learner control.<br />

These learner characteristics are distinctive and useful for building the research framework of this<br />

study. Considering the limited scope of this study, the first two dimensions were selected as the main<br />

research variables and then examined.<br />

As Long and Agyekum (1983) highlighted, the attributes of self-direction in learning are becoming<br />

increasingly important. Educators have been challenged to assist in the development of SDL skills<br />

and to encourage learners to use self-direction more freely in their learning activities. Long and<br />

Agyekum are not the first researchers to introduce the idea of SDL. Tough (1966) first determined that<br />

SDL involves a person with the ability to learn how to plan and maintain motivation. Knowles (1975)<br />

suggested SDL involves a person with the ability to diagnose their own learning demands, draft<br />

learning objectives, choose appropriate learning strategies, and evaluate the learning effect.<br />

In a major application of SDL, Guglielmino (1977) introduced the term SDLR and developed a selfreport<br />

questionnaire with Likert-type items. Eight factor aspects were included in the SDLR<br />

questionnaire. These eight factor aspects underlying the SDLR ascertain learner readiness for SDL<br />

(McCune and Guglielmino, 1992). The SDLR questionnaire is widely known as the self-directed<br />

learning readiness scale (SDLRS). Though there have been some criticisms of SDLRS, (Brockett,<br />

1987; Field, 1989; Straka and Hinz, 1996), the vast majority of studies have supported the<br />

questionnaire’s reliability and validity (Delahaye and Smith, 1995; Long and Agyekum, 1983; McCune<br />

and Guglielmino, 1991; Russell, 1988). The SDLRS and its self-scoring form, the Learning Preference<br />

Assessment, are the most frequently used methods for assessing SDL readiness (Merriam, Caffarella,<br />

and Baumgartner, 2007).<br />

According to Chang (2006), Guglielmino’s SDLR questionnaire has been translated into Chinese and<br />

carefully revalidated by Teng (1995); the number of questions was reduced from 58 to 55 and the<br />

original eight aspects were reduced to four aspects in consideration of cultural differences. The four<br />

aspects are (1) effective learning (EL), (2) active learning (AL), (3) independent learning (IL), and (4)<br />

creative learning (CL).<br />

With the current information technology advancements, the SDLR can be adapted to a learnercontrolled<br />

eLearning environment. The link between SDLR and eLearning was determined by Warner,<br />

Christie, and Choy (1998). They defined the readiness for online learning as follows: (1) students’<br />

preferences for the form of delivery compared to face-to-face classroom instruction; (2) student<br />

confidence when using electronic communication for learning and, in particular, competence and<br />

confidence in the use of Internet and computer-mediated communication; and (3) ability to engage in<br />

autonomous learning.<br />

5. Learning motivation<br />

Motivation significantly influences learners’ intentions of remaining in a self-regulated, learnercontrolled<br />

eLearning environment. According to Keller (1983), motivation affects individuals’ efforts<br />

and attitudes toward learning. In other words, motivation influences the selection or avoidance of<br />

specific experiences or goals as well as influences the degree of effort learners apply to the<br />

experience or goal. Keller (1983) suggested that learning motivation is affected by four perceptual<br />

components: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. Each component plays a critical role<br />

in motivating students throughout the learning process. This is the origin of the ARCS model, which<br />

has been wildly employed as the theoretical foundation of various instructional strategy developments.<br />

Keller (1987, 2006) further recognized several categories of motivational factors that may affect the<br />

learning outcome. These factors were used to develop his motivational design models. The models<br />

are categorized into four groups: person-centred models, environment-centred models, interactioncentred<br />

models, and omnibus models. The first two models are in agreement with recent theoretical<br />

848

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!