27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Andy Coverdale<br />

A former interdisciplinary postgraduate student, Emily is in her 2nd year at a doctoral training<br />

centre exploring spiritual technology. A self-confessed social media sceptic, she has cautiously<br />

engaged in blogging and using Twitter.<br />

James is a part-time student studying for a Humanities PhD. He set up several blogs and Twitter<br />

to initially connect with specialist online communities for his research into collecting cultures, but<br />

has since used these to establish connections with other researchers in his field.<br />

Hannah is a 3rd year PhD English student and an early adopter of social networking sites. More<br />

recently, she has become a prolific user of Twitter and she set up a PhD blog to develop a<br />

professional online profile. Hannah is also engaged in social media activities with a number of<br />

activist and special interest student groups.<br />

Chris is a 2nd year PhD at an interdisciplinary doctoral training centre examining approaches to<br />

using technology as advocacy for people with learning disabilities. With an arts and teaching<br />

background, he has retained a web-based network of previous work contexts.<br />

Rebecca is a 2nd year doctoral training centre student with a design and entrepreneurial<br />

background. She has used a range of social media for first time to establish connections between<br />

academic and professional networks. She was also instrumental in establishing the Google group<br />

and external facing group blog for the doctoral training centre.<br />

Paula, a 4th year humanities student at a Russell Group university, set up a Facebook group that<br />

was to become instrumental in creating an international network of doctoral students in her field.<br />

She has also used social media to engage key communities as part of her fieldwork, and to<br />

support a number of interdisciplinary student initiatives and an external internship project.<br />

Data Collection and Analysis<br />

The study adopted a holistic perspective of social media activity based on a number of key<br />

assumptions:<br />

<strong>Academic</strong>s who engage in using social media often use multiple tools and platforms<br />

Underlying technologies (for example, hypertext and RSS) and related processes (such as<br />

aggregation, subscription and tagging) provide persistent forms of interconnectivity between<br />

different social media<br />

The adoption and use of social media is transient in nature, subject to changes in technological,<br />

social and cultural trends<br />

Membership of academic communities and networks formed through, or supported by, social<br />

media tend to be interrelated and overlapping in nature<br />

Participants’ social media activities consisted primarily of using personal and group blogs, social<br />

networking sites, microblogging and content sharing sites. Specific social media were selected as<br />

sites for observation in agreement with each participant in accordance with ethical procedures.<br />

Observable data were defined as that resulting in new or modified digital artefacts, such as a blog<br />

post or a tweet, and semi-permanent features such as profiles. Participants also submitted links to<br />

any additional activities on sites not observed by the researcher (e.g. commenting on other blogs).<br />

Field notes were taken to examine contextual information regarding individual, community, and<br />

institutional factors, and participants’ relational values within their various online communities and<br />

networks (such as those identifying location, academic disciplines and hierarchies). Three individual<br />

90-minute interviews were conducted with each participant at roughly four-month intervals, using a<br />

semi-structured format of open-ended questions. All interviews were recorded and fully transcribed.<br />

Multiple object-oriented activity systems were drafted and refined throughout the study in an iterative<br />

process between key stages of observation and participant interviews. All digital artefacts were<br />

logged and codified, and key exemplars were selected as sources of reference and prompts during<br />

interviews. Rather than using activity systems to pre-define the coding process, a constant<br />

comparative method (Glaser and Strauss, 1967) of open coding was adopted to provide an inductive<br />

and systematic process of examining the data. At each key stage, initial codes were formed, refined<br />

and merged until a point of saturation was reached, after which a process of axial coding was used to<br />

develop the larger categories or themes on which the activity systems were based. Thick description<br />

from field notes and interview data helped develop participant narratives from which patterns of social<br />

media adoption and use could be determined.<br />

912

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!