27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chien-hwa Wang and Cheng-ping Chen<br />

arguments. For example, (Ryan and Deci, 2000) defined the intrinsic and extrinsic factors of<br />

motivation. Intrinsic motivation refers to individual interests that one grows in knowledge and skills,<br />

while extrinsic motivation originates from an environment external to learning. The factors influencing<br />

intrinsic motivation in the Web 2.0 environment may include attitude in knowledge acquisition (AKA),<br />

expectation of professional performance (EPP), and solving practical problems (SPP). The factors<br />

influencing extrinsic motivation may include attraction of virtual society (AVS), convenience of Internet<br />

usability (CIU), and self-efficacy of learning (SEL). Ryan and Deci (2000) asserted that motivation can<br />

be determined intrinsically by individuals and externally by sources due to situational variables and<br />

environmental factors. These two orientation types significantly affect student learning performance.<br />

The intrinsic and extrinsic orientation of learning motivation has been applied in recent research on<br />

motivation in eLearning circumstances. For example, Law, Lee and Yu (2010) employed this<br />

dichotomously oriented scheme as the framework for designing computer programming courses.<br />

Hung et al (2010) also employed the same orientation as the theoretical background when defining<br />

the five dimensional model of learning readiness for online learning.<br />

6. Research framework<br />

This study argues that Web 2.0 eLearning research should focus on the learner aspect rather than the<br />

instructional design or instruction aspects. Furthermore, for Web 2.0 eLearning studies, the unique<br />

media attributes of Web 2.0 (freedom of searching, selecting, acquiring, and creating information for<br />

learners’ own purposes) should be considered and the effects of specific learner characteristics within<br />

a Web 2.0 environment should be examined. Recent Web 2.0 eLearning studies tended to focus on<br />

developing learner control strategies and testing their effectiveness. However, these learner control<br />

studies did not consider the effects of Web 2.0 learner characteristics. Fortunately, some dimensions<br />

of the learner characteristics of online learning have been identified. Among these characteristics, this<br />

study considers SDLR to be the important factor influencing Web 2.0 learning. In summation of the<br />

literature reviewed above, this study speculates that SDLR is positively related to learners’ intrinsic<br />

and extrinsic motivations of Web 2.0 learning. Furthermore, we also speculate that learners’ Internet<br />

experience affects self-directed learning readiness, since research evidence has shown that Internet<br />

experience influences on the learners’ intention to utilize the Internet, and the level of web<br />

experiences play a significant role on the intention to use a particular Internet environment (Alenezi,<br />

Abdul Karim, and Veloo, 2010; Fusilier and Durlabhji, 2005). The main research hypotheses of this<br />

study are as follows:<br />

H1: Internet experience affects SDLR<br />

H1.1: Internet experience affects overall SDLR<br />

H1.2: Internet experience affects each subcategory of SDLR<br />

H2: There is a relationship between SDLR and learning motivation<br />

H2.1: There is a relationship between overall SDLR and overall learning motivation<br />

H2.2: There are relationships between each subcategory of SDLR and each factor of learning<br />

motivation<br />

7. Methodology<br />

A questionnaire survey was conducted to collect data from college students in Taipei City, Taiwan. All<br />

subjects of the study are frequent users of a Web 2.0 knowledge-sharing site widely used by college<br />

students. The data collected were analysed statistically and the research hypotheses were tested.<br />

Figure 1 shows the research framework of the study.<br />

7.1 The instrument<br />

The SDLR and learning motivation questionnaire was designed according to the research framework<br />

and comprised three parts: the demographic information, the SDLRS, and the learning motivation<br />

inventory. The demographic data included gender, college grade, learning domain, Internet<br />

experience, and prior knowledge. The SDLRS modified from Teng (1995) had four factors: effective<br />

learning, learning motivation, independent learning, and creative learning. Finally, the learning<br />

849

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!