27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nahla Aljojo et al.<br />

Adaptive hypermedia research has received more attention during the last two decades, however it<br />

still is unclear which aspects of learning styles are worth modeling, and what can be done differently<br />

for users with different learning styles. An adaptive e-learning hypermedia is an approach whose<br />

target is to personalize the learning experience for the learner (De Bra et al., 2004; Henze and Nejdl,<br />

2004). A number of adaptive educational systems have been developed based on learning styles as<br />

a source for adaptation, including: AEC-CS (Trantafillou et al., 2002), INSPIRE (Grigoriadou et al.,<br />

2001), iWeaver (Wolf, 2003), MASPLANG (Peña et al, 2002; Peña, 2004), LSAS (Bajraktarevic et al,<br />

2003), EDUCE (Kelly, 2005) and ILASH (Bajraktarevic et al., 2003a). One of the key challenges in<br />

such adaptive learning systems is the development of robust experimental evaluation mechanisms to<br />

assess their impact on student's achievement. For instance, Brown et al. (2009) investigated adaptive<br />

e-learning hypermedia that specially utilizes learning style as their adaptation mechanism; they found<br />

that out of 10 systems, 6 systems did not seem to have published any quantitative evaluations in their<br />

recent research. Typical would be AES-CS (Triantafillou et al., 2003) and INSPIRE (Papanikolaou et<br />

al., 2003) which uses some empirical data in the form of descriptive statistics and but no inferential<br />

statistics testing, and the number of users were relatively small (n = 10 and n = 23, respectively).<br />

A common evaluation approach involves comparing performance on an adaptive learning system with<br />

non-adaptive versions for different cohorts of users. However, there are many challenges with<br />

comparing non-adaptive with adaptive version of learning systems (De Bra, 2000). Any difference<br />

between the groups’ performances might be attributed to users’ features (e.g. initial knowledge, goals<br />

etc) or wider environment.<br />

This paper presents an approach to integrate learning styles into adaptive e-learning hypermedia<br />

system and an approach to evaluate the impact of such a learning system. This paper hopes to make<br />

contribution by presenting a further case study of a dedicated adaptive educational system and<br />

providing guidance and discussion on both development issues and how to evaluate the effectiveness<br />

of an adaptive learning system. Existing adaptive learning systems are predominantly English based.<br />

This paper hopes to make further contribution by bring adaptive learning capability to on-English<br />

speaking communities.<br />

1.2 Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model<br />

In Felder-Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) (Felder and Silverman, 1988), learners are<br />

characterized by values on four dimensions. Table 1: summarizes learning environment preferences<br />

of typical learners from each of the four dimensions of the Felder Silverman model. The FSLSM<br />

provides a good base to develop adaptive learning systems (Aljojo and Adams 2009; Aljojo and<br />

Adams 2010) and was used as the base in the Teacher Assisting and Subject Adaptive Material<br />

(TASAM) system described in this paper.<br />

Table 1: Felder’s learning dimensions<br />

Active Explains to others Tries things out, works within a group, discusses and<br />

Reflective Thinks before doing something, works alone<br />

Sensing Learns from and memorizes facts, solves problems by well-established<br />

methods, patient with details, works slower<br />

Intuitive Discovers possibilities and relationships, innovative, easily grasp new concepts,<br />

abstractions and mathematical formulation, works faster<br />

Visual Learns from pictures, diagrams, flow charts, time lines,<br />

films, multimedia content and demonstrations<br />

Verbal Learns form written and spoken explanations<br />

Sequential Learns and thinks in linear/sequential steps<br />

Global Learns in large leaps, absorbing material almost randomly<br />

The reasons to choose this learning style theory in this research are:<br />

Its Index of Learning Style (ILS) questionnaire (Felder and Soloman, 2003) provides a convenient<br />

and practical approach to establish the dominant learning style of each student.<br />

The results of ILS can be linked easily to adaptive environments (Paredes And Rodriguez,<br />

2002).<br />

It is most appropriate and feasible to be implemented for hypermedia courseware (Carver, et al.,<br />

1999; Kinshuk and Lin, 2003).<br />

898

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!