27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fatemeh Orooji et al.<br />

awareness and lead to more organized and effective approaches to teaching and learning. To<br />

address this issue, our interest concerned providing a unified methodology to define and represent<br />

various models’ dimensions through predefined construction phases. Our depicted mechanism has<br />

illustrated the selected models in a similar structure and moved toward a comprehensive LS provided<br />

for each user based on different aspects of utilized modelers in addition to some facilities to compare<br />

their results in some understandable representations. In this way, there is a possibility to have a more<br />

precise picture of each learner decreasing the amount of uncertainty which he/she will be interfaced<br />

by trying just one modeler (due to the modeler inconsistency and unreliability (Coffield et al., 2004)).<br />

The paper is organized as follows. We begin with a brief overview of LS theory in section 1 followed<br />

by a description of some known LSs in details. Our proposed approach for defining a LS and its<br />

different dimensions is then introduced. Section 4 is devoted to the depiction of our unified LS<br />

modeling system to point out some of its features. Some outcomes of utilizing the proposed system<br />

are explained in Section 5. Finally, we present some conclusions and recommendations for further<br />

study.<br />

2. Background<br />

Learning style is one of learner individual traits typically defined as the way people prefer to learn,<br />

representing their habitual manner of acquiring knowledge and skills via studying or experiencing<br />

(Coffield et al., 2004). Understanding LS enables a learner to improve their self-awareness and metacognition<br />

skills, to develop his/her natural approaches to learning, and even to provide more capacity<br />

to learn in ways that he/she may require more efforts. If students know about their LSs and<br />

preferences, they can select better choices about learning tasks they should engage with. On the<br />

other hand, knowing the LS may enrich instructors’ information about their students, leading them to<br />

develop a range of teaching strategies to engage learner individual strengths. Some studies have<br />

demonstrated benefits of adapting learning contents and activities based on learners’ LS (Siadaty and<br />

Taghiyareh, 2007) while some other researchers have some doubts about the correctness and<br />

necessity of such adaptation (Coffield et al., 2004).<br />

2.1 LS modeling approaches<br />

Generally, there are two learner modeling approaches as follows (Brusilovsky and Millán, 2007):<br />

Collaborative: In this approach, users explicitly provide information about themselves via filling out a<br />

questionnaire. Although this approach provides reliable information, most of earners do not like<br />

spending a considerable amount of time to fill corresponding questions. Almost all LS modelers<br />

introduce their special questionnaires, some explained in following sections.<br />

Automatic: In this approach, the system implicitly gathers any information needed while users are<br />

working/learning. Class discussion/student reflection, instructor observations, cognitive sciences or<br />

artificial intelligence are all utilized in this approach, no need to ask implicit questions.<br />

2.2 Learning style main parameters<br />

Learning preferences related to different LSs can be summarized as follows (Popescu et al., 2007):<br />

Environment, Physical dimensions, Perception modality, Field dependence/field independence,<br />

Processing information, Reasoning, Organizing information, Motivation, Persistence, Pacing, Social<br />

aspects, Study organization, Coordinating instance.<br />

Also, there is an "Onion Model" which categorizes LSs into four layers (E.Popescu et al., 2007):<br />

Personality Models focus on the personality traits of the learner and the way they influence the<br />

learning process.<br />

Information Processing Models focus on the processes of acquiring, ordering, and engaging with<br />

information.<br />

Social Interaction Models focus on the collaborative aspects of the learning process.<br />

Instructional Preference Models focus on the environmental, emotional, and sociological<br />

preferences of the learner.<br />

610

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!