27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An Integrated Environment for Providing Learning Style<br />

Information in a Unified Manner<br />

Fatemeh Orooji, Fattaneh Taghiyareh and Zahra Rahimi<br />

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tehran University,<br />

Tehran, Iran<br />

f.orooji@ut.ac.ir<br />

ftaghiyar@ut.ac.ir<br />

z.rahimi@ut.ac.ir<br />

Abstract: Learning styles inventories provide insights into student perceptions about how they prefer to learn.<br />

Since learning styles have notoriously some inconsistencies and invalidities, it is unreliable to base instructional<br />

decisions on just one learning style preferences. This paper introduces a new approach to integrate various<br />

learning style modelers in a unified system. The unified system contains some predefined phases in modeling<br />

each style’s dimensions and some representing suggestions in order to visualize modeler results. Four popular<br />

learning styles along with their specific dimensions and report representations have been studied to demonstrate<br />

how to synthesize various inventories into a single representation of learners’ learning styles. Utilizing integrated<br />

environment in the University of Tehran, department of electrical and computer engineering, has revealed some<br />

dependencies between a modeler dimensions as well as some correlation between two modelers' dimensions.<br />

The implication of this effort is to provide advice about how web-based instructions can be modified to<br />

accommodate learners’ differences.<br />

Keywords: user model, learning style, learning style questionnaire, web-based educational system, eLearning<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In the past decades, the rapid growth of the internet has brought a great deal of changes in our<br />

educational environment, demanding continuous access to education. These web-based educational<br />

systems need to consider different characteristics of a large number of students, constructing their<br />

user models. User model represents essential information about each user in two dimensions: first,<br />

viewing him as an individual considering the user’s knowledge, interests, goals, background, and<br />

individual traits; second, modeling his/her context of work which consists of location, time of day and<br />

platform. Individual traits are stable and usually determined using psychological tests, consist of<br />

personality traits, cognitive styles, cognitive factors and learning styles (Brusilovsky and Millán, 2007).<br />

Learning style (LS) shows how people learn and how they prefer to organize and represent<br />

information. People have different strategies in managing information and different ways of<br />

implementing these strategies. Considering the LS of each learner individually, provides facilities to<br />

adapt the content (form, structure, presentation order of learning activities and choices of these<br />

activities) to improve the learning results, which is impossible for a teacher in a traditional educating<br />

system with a group of learners (Reed et al., 2000). There are several studies on some pedagogically<br />

personalized learning contents based on learners’ LSs, indicating differences in performance between<br />

matched and non-matched learners (Siadaty and Taghiyareh, 2007). However, there are still some<br />

questions about the consistency of visual, auditory and kinaesthetic preferences and the value of<br />

matching teaching and LSs (Coffield et al., 2004).<br />

A considerable amount of research has been carried out to clear what is the best method to capture<br />

learners’ LS. LSs can be detected through learner’s profile as well as his behaviors, for example his<br />

navigation behaviour in web-based educational system (Bousbia et al., 2010). In addition, using a<br />

questionnaire is another acceptable approach to detect user LS. Naturally almost all of known models<br />

have proposed their own questionnaire independently (Felder and Silverman, 1988) (Grasha and<br />

Riechmann, 1975) (Briggs Myers, 1962). It is noticeable that there are more than 70 definitions of the<br />

LS concept and many researchers have tried to evaluate them showing the relationships between the<br />

LS identified by the instrument and students' actual learning. It has been claimed that since “a reliable<br />

and valid measure of learning styles has not yet been developed, it will be more useful to focus on<br />

learners’ previous experiences and motivation” (Coffield et al., 2004).<br />

This research aimed to be beyond any individual LS by gathering different LS models together and<br />

unifying their information via a proposed approach. This unified modeling system provides a complete<br />

report of learners’ LSs in adoption to integrated modelers, which may bring about better self-<br />

609

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!