27.06.2013 Views

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

Volume Two - Academic Conferences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Methodology<br />

Adriana Schiopoiu Burlea et al.<br />

This study tests the four hypotheses using data obtained with the help of an email questionnaire sent<br />

to a multi-stage random sample of EDU-Antreprenor students. The data were collected from January<br />

2011 until April 2011.<br />

A total of 367 out of 458 students returned a usable questionnaire (~80.13%).<br />

As required by research ethics procedures, the surveys were voluntary and students were given the<br />

opportunity to remain anonymous or to mention their identity.<br />

The processing of the questionnaires was done with SPSS 16.0.<br />

The respondents were asked to indicate their opinion related to the use of the eLearning platform,<br />

using a five-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). A rating of 1<br />

represented low satisfaction, while a rating of 5 represented high satisfaction.<br />

Of the 458 questionnaires distributed, 367 completed and usable questionnaires were returned,<br />

representing a response rate of 80.1%.<br />

Table 1 lists a summary of the response rate and demographic information for the respondents in<br />

2009 and 2010. The effective response rate was 80.14% in 2009, and 80.50% in 2010. A range of<br />

demographic information was available for the overall respondents, as well as collected part of the<br />

survey, including gender and age range. This permitted a comparison between the respondent<br />

sample and the overall staff population based on these demographic dimensions, as presented in<br />

Table 1.<br />

Table1: Basic characteristics of respondents (n = 367)<br />

Basic characteristics Frequency Percentage<br />

2009 2010 2009 2010<br />

Gender<br />

Male 64 61 37 31<br />

Female 109 133 63 69<br />

Total 173 194 100 100<br />

Age range<br />

20-24 45 51 26 26<br />

25-29 58 41 34 21<br />

30-34 31 32 18 16<br />

35-39 19 30 11 15<br />

40-44 12 26 7 14<br />

45-49 6 9 3 5<br />

50 + years 2 5 1 3<br />

Total 173 194 100 100<br />

Table 2 provides a summary of the response rate of beginner and advanced students. This permitted<br />

a comparison between the two student categories.<br />

Table 2: Response rates<br />

User level Response rate (%)<br />

Beginners - 135 respondents 79.88%<br />

Advanced – 232 respondents 86.57 %<br />

Although the obtained response rates were comparatively high, they were not unexpected for an<br />

online voluntary survey and the generally good match between the sample and population<br />

demographic characteristics and the relatively large absolute numbers of respondents, for both<br />

beginner and advanced students in 2009 and in 2010. It suggests that we can have some confidence<br />

in drawing more general inferences from the respondent data.<br />

757

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!