19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the imbalance and cost, the system is becoming less<br />

and less effective. As pointed out in Chapter III, the large libraries<br />

are expected to provide the service without compensation,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> any imbalance, so there is no incentive to assign a high<br />

priority to the activity. Efficiency in filling interlibrary loan<br />

requests merely encourages more requests, until the increase in<br />

workload causes the service to deteriorate to the point that requests<br />

are again discouraged.<br />

Filling free interlibrary loan requests has always been<br />

treated by the large net lenders as a troublesome extra,<br />

and this, along with the cumbersome nature <strong>of</strong> the decentralized<br />

system, accounts to a large extent <strong>for</strong> the<br />

relative slowness and inefficiency <strong>of</strong> this activity in<br />

the U.S. 16<br />

Not surprisingly, a few research libraries are beginning to charge <strong>for</strong><br />

the service. <strong>The</strong> effect is likely to increase the load even more on<br />

those libraries which still provide the service free, and if <strong>for</strong> no<br />

other reason than a defensive one the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> libraries<br />

should consider instituting such charges. Clearly, a national agreement<br />

on a standardized fee is needed, but attempts by such organizations as<br />

the Association <strong>of</strong> Research <strong>Libraries</strong> to devise a fee system have so<br />

far been unsuccessful. If an increasing number <strong>of</strong> individual libraries<br />

begin charging on their own, however, this may serve as a sufficient<br />

goad to produce a national agreement.<br />

Some kind <strong>of</strong> national system is clearly needed, because no library,<br />

nor even a system such as proposed <strong>for</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong>,<br />

can expect to meet all <strong>of</strong> the legitimate library needs <strong>of</strong> its users.<br />

In economic terms a national system is also desirable, because as<br />

Williams' study has pointed out, "it is apparent that <strong>for</strong> every publication<br />

there is some frequency <strong>of</strong> use at which it becomes cheaper<br />

<strong>for</strong> the library to borrow, or photocopy, it from another institution<br />

than to acquire and maintain its own copy." 17<br />

16 De Gennaro, "Austerity, Technology, and Resource Sharing: Research<br />

<strong>Libraries</strong> Face the Future," Library Journal, v. 100 (May 15, 1976),<br />

pp. 921-922.<br />

17 Gordon Williams and others, Library Cost Models: Owning Versus<br />

Borrowing Serial Publications, Office <strong>of</strong> Science In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Service, 1968, p. 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!