19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I. <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> and Its <strong>Libraries</strong> 19<br />

over the changed expectations.<br />

By 1971, with the new climate <strong>of</strong> financial austerity in full swing,<br />

the State's Department <strong>of</strong> Finance had also become concerned about the<br />

<strong>University</strong>'s libraries, primarily from the standpoint <strong>of</strong> their cost. In<br />

late 1971 and early 1972, the Department published a two-volume report<br />

entitled <strong>The</strong> Management and Operations <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong>:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Library System <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong>. <strong>The</strong> first volume concentrated on<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> library collections, and cast doubt on whether the<br />

<strong>University</strong>'s goals <strong>for</strong> collection-building in the 70's could be met.<br />

Its authors pointed out that many parts <strong>of</strong> the existing collection were<br />

used infrequently, and argued that much more should be done in the way<br />

<strong>of</strong> "increased interdependence, cooperation, and coordination," particularly<br />

in the use <strong>of</strong> collections. Among the major recommendations were:<br />

• that the <strong>University</strong> "reexamine and restate its library acquisition<br />

goals and policies";<br />

• that steps be taken to avoid unnecessary duplication;<br />

• that "budgetary restraints be used to insure compliance" with<br />

these recommendations;<br />

• that more funds be allocated "to improve interlibrary cooperation<br />

and coordination within the UC system";<br />

• that more materials be purchased in micr<strong>of</strong>orm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second volume concerned technical operations <strong>of</strong> the libraries,<br />

criticized the use <strong>of</strong> blanket and approval orders, and recommended more<br />

extensive use <strong>of</strong> automation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> disagreed with many <strong>of</strong> the report's specific findings<br />

and recommendations, but agreed in general that steps toward greater<br />

coordination and cooperation were desirable, pointing out that much<br />

activity in this direction was already underway.<br />

Library <strong>Plan</strong>ning in the 70's. <strong>The</strong> austerity <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

climate, revised growth projections, and the DOF report all combined,<br />

in fact, to accelerate systemwide library planning ef<strong>for</strong>ts from this<br />

time <strong>for</strong>ward. Just as academic planning to this point had been principally<br />

concerned with the growth in enrollments, however, much <strong>of</strong> the<br />

initial library planning ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>of</strong> the 70's continued to be preoccupied<br />

with the growth <strong>of</strong> library collections.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!