19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER V<br />

IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATION OF MATERIALS<br />

From the standpoint <strong>of</strong> the user, the library's first significant<br />

task is to provide him with the means <strong>of</strong> identifying the<br />

materials he needs, or if these items are already known, to locate<br />

them.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Card Catalog. For the past century, the library's<br />

principal method <strong>of</strong> doing this has been the card catalog. <strong>The</strong><br />

large cabinets with the 3 by 5 cards have been so ubiquitous that<br />

to most users and librarians alike the catalog is the sine qua non<br />

<strong>of</strong> librarianship. Yet today the card catalog is in trouble in most<br />

large research libraries, and in fact has become an endangered<br />

species. <strong>The</strong> New York Public Library closed its card catalog several<br />

years ago, replacing it with a computer-produced book catalog,<br />

and a number <strong>of</strong> other libraries, including the Library <strong>of</strong> Congress,<br />

have announced plans to close their catalogs as well. In the <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong>, the Berkeley and Los Angeles campuses have<br />

had a series <strong>of</strong> committees studying the desirability <strong>of</strong> a similar<br />

step <strong>for</strong> the last several years.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is, in short, a growing feeling that the card catalog<br />

has become, in most large institutions, an unwieldy and ineffective<br />

device. <strong>The</strong>re are many reasons, but the main one is simply that<br />

they have been around <strong>for</strong> so long, and that fact alone contributes<br />

to their awkwardness and complexity. <strong>The</strong> Berkeley catalogs, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, were started in 1876, about the time other libraries<br />

began to switch from the older, book-<strong>for</strong>m catalogs. As was the custom,<br />

the cards were painstakingly written out in "library hand,"<br />

and some <strong>of</strong> these cards are still to be found in the catalogs. <strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> Librarian at the time (Joseph C. Rowell) commented when<br />

he first proposed the card catalog that "it has been suggested...<br />

that use <strong>of</strong> the 'typewriter' be made in making the catalogue--if

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!