19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

X. Housing 177<br />

For the purposes <strong>of</strong> the model and this plan, there<strong>for</strong>e, two<br />

regional compact shelving facilities are assumed, one in the North<br />

and one in the South.<br />

Staffing the Facilities. For each <strong>of</strong> the two facilities, a<br />

minimal staff will be necessary to service requests and carry on its<br />

activities. Based on the experience <strong>of</strong> other institutions and estimated<br />

workload, a staff <strong>of</strong> 13 is projected <strong>for</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the two facilities,<br />

as follows:<br />

1 Director<br />

4 FTE <strong>for</strong> maintenance <strong>of</strong> files and circulation activities<br />

(including service to on-site users)<br />

4 FTE <strong>for</strong> shipping and receiving<br />

4 FTE <strong>for</strong> stack maintenance, retrieval and replacement <strong>of</strong><br />

needed items.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> this staffing is estimated at approximately $194,000 per<br />

center per year. For the 6 years between the time the facilities are<br />

occupied and the year 1987/88, the cumulative staffing costs <strong>for</strong> the<br />

two facilities, in <strong>1977</strong> dollars, would be $2,328,000.<br />

Total Costs <strong>of</strong> the Facilities. <strong>The</strong> total costs <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

facilities, both on-campus and <strong>of</strong>f-campus can now be calculated, and<br />

are shown in Table 33. Some new construction on campuses will still<br />

be necessary <strong>for</strong> works that do not fall into the categories eligible<br />

<strong>for</strong> compact shelving, so the cost <strong>of</strong> this construction must be added<br />

in. <strong>The</strong> total costs <strong>for</strong> this alternative, as indicated, are then<br />

about $56,561,000 if the facilities are <strong>of</strong>f-campus, and about<br />

$59,165,000 if they are constructed on campus. <strong>The</strong> savings realized<br />

by this alternative as compared with the "base case" are $32,869,000<br />

or $30,265,000, depending on the location <strong>of</strong> the facilities.<br />

Elimination <strong>of</strong> Unnecessary Duplicates. If two regional facilities<br />

are assumed, an additional economy measure may also be considered.<br />

Because the materials to be shelved in the regional<br />

facilities will be little-used, there would be relatively little<br />

point in retaining more than one copy within the region. With the<br />

data collected by the research team, it is possible to estimate the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!