19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

II. <strong>The</strong> Function <strong>of</strong> the Library 29<br />

visited the Purdue <strong>University</strong> library, by category <strong>of</strong> user, and found<br />

the following as the "most common" reasons:<br />

• <strong>for</strong> faculty, to "do research <strong>for</strong> a publishable paper or book";<br />

• <strong>for</strong> graduate students, to "find and read material <strong>for</strong> a course";<br />

• <strong>for</strong> undergraduates, to "do homework with own books" (with the<br />

next most frequent response "to find and read material <strong>for</strong> a course"). 4<br />

Raffel and Shishko found that the "main purposes" <strong>of</strong> users <strong>of</strong> the<br />

M.I.T. library were to find "books and materials <strong>for</strong> research" (76 percent),<br />

"to browse and read current journals" (63 percent), and to read<br />

"required and recommended" materials (61 percent). Only 20 percent<br />

looked on the library as a place to study their own materials, and only<br />

2 percent as a place "to lounge, relax, socialize." 5<br />

It is clear, then, that <strong>for</strong> all users except undergraduates, the<br />

primary purpose in coming to a library is access to in<strong>for</strong>mation (<strong>of</strong> one<br />

sort or another), and even <strong>for</strong> undergraduates this purpose is second<br />

only to their desire <strong>for</strong> a place to study.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mation Needed. <strong>The</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation needed by library<br />

users falls into three categories:<br />

• brief factual in<strong>for</strong>mation (<strong>for</strong> example, the <strong>for</strong>mula <strong>of</strong> a chemical<br />

compound, the population <strong>of</strong> a city, or the birthdate <strong>of</strong> a composer);<br />

• in<strong>for</strong>mation items <strong>of</strong> which the user already knows the identity<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example, a particular book, journal article, or technical report);<br />

• bodies <strong>of</strong> recorded in<strong>for</strong>mation (<strong>for</strong> example, a collection <strong>of</strong><br />

books on a given topic, or--as a student might phrase it--"something<br />

on" a particular subject), the items themselves requiring examination<br />

in person by the user in order to determine their relevance to his<br />

needs.<br />

Brief factual in<strong>for</strong>mation may be found by the user himself in a<br />

reference work, or it may be provided by a librarian or library assistant.<br />

A study at Yale <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> over 5,000 reference desk inquiries<br />

4 Phillip V. Rzasa and John H. Moriarty, "<strong>The</strong> Types and Needs <strong>of</strong> Academic<br />

Library Users: A Case Study <strong>of</strong> 6,568 Responses," College and Research<br />

<strong>Libraries</strong>, v. 31, no. 6 (November 1970), p. 406.<br />

5 Jeffrey A. Raffel and Robert Shishko, Systematic Analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>Libraries</strong>: An Application <strong>of</strong> Cost-Benefit Analysis to the M.I.T. <strong>Libraries</strong>,<br />

M.I.T. Press, 1969, p. 66.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!