19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />

area as necessary to maintain the present ratio <strong>of</strong> library users to staff.<br />

Housing the Library System (pages 147-185). No funds <strong>for</strong> construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> library facilities have been approved <strong>for</strong> several years, and by<br />

standard <strong>for</strong>mulas the <strong>University</strong> libraries are now deficient in space by<br />

almost 250,000 square feet. Assuming continuation <strong>of</strong> the present methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> housing library collections, this deficiency will grow to over three<br />

quarters <strong>of</strong> a million square feet by the end <strong>of</strong> another ten years. Considering<br />

the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the problem and the fact that construction costs<br />

continue to escalate, it is obvious that all reasonable alternatives to<br />

present housing methods should be explored.<br />

To accomplish this task, data was collected on the size and characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> each library, the patterns <strong>of</strong> recorded use <strong>of</strong> materials, and<br />

other in<strong>for</strong>mation related directly or indirectly to the space problem. A<br />

computerized simulation model was then designed to calculate the effect,<br />

in both space and funds required, <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> alternatives,<br />

singly and in combination. Based on the results, the plan rejects the<br />

alternatives <strong>of</strong> large-scale weeding and micr<strong>of</strong>ilming <strong>of</strong> existing collections<br />

as unfeasible and not cost-effective. It does appear, however, that<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> compact shelving techniques on a regional basis would <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

significant economies, and could be implemented in such a way that service<br />

to users would not be seriously degraded--and might in fact be improved.<br />

As noted in Chapter IV, not all material is needed immediately, and material<br />

needed only within two days (the regional goal) might be provided<br />

more efficiently from a regional facility than from individual campuses.<br />

Some additional construction <strong>of</strong> traditional open-stack library facilities<br />

on campuses will still be necessary to accommodate the material likely<br />

to be used frequently, but the amount <strong>of</strong> such construction will be much<br />

less than without the regional facilities. <strong>The</strong> regional facilities<br />

could also be used by CSUC and other institutions on a cost-sharing<br />

basis.<br />

More extensive use <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>orms under one set <strong>of</strong> circumstances<br />

also appears to be advisable. If a micr<strong>of</strong>orm edition <strong>of</strong> a current journal<br />

is available, and is suitable <strong>for</strong> research use in micr<strong>of</strong>orm, several<br />

benefits resulting from procuring the micr<strong>of</strong>orm edition and retaining it<br />

in lieu <strong>of</strong> binding the originals. Space is saved; binding costs are<br />

eliminated; the possibility <strong>of</strong> theft is sharply reduced; the material

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!