The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
198 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />
area as necessary to maintain the present ratio <strong>of</strong> library users to staff.<br />
Housing the Library System (pages 147-185). No funds <strong>for</strong> construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> library facilities have been approved <strong>for</strong> several years, and by<br />
standard <strong>for</strong>mulas the <strong>University</strong> libraries are now deficient in space by<br />
almost 250,000 square feet. Assuming continuation <strong>of</strong> the present methods<br />
<strong>of</strong> housing library collections, this deficiency will grow to over three<br />
quarters <strong>of</strong> a million square feet by the end <strong>of</strong> another ten years. Considering<br />
the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the problem and the fact that construction costs<br />
continue to escalate, it is obvious that all reasonable alternatives to<br />
present housing methods should be explored.<br />
To accomplish this task, data was collected on the size and characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> each library, the patterns <strong>of</strong> recorded use <strong>of</strong> materials, and<br />
other in<strong>for</strong>mation related directly or indirectly to the space problem. A<br />
computerized simulation model was then designed to calculate the effect,<br />
in both space and funds required, <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> alternatives,<br />
singly and in combination. Based on the results, the plan rejects the<br />
alternatives <strong>of</strong> large-scale weeding and micr<strong>of</strong>ilming <strong>of</strong> existing collections<br />
as unfeasible and not cost-effective. It does appear, however, that<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> compact shelving techniques on a regional basis would <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
significant economies, and could be implemented in such a way that service<br />
to users would not be seriously degraded--and might in fact be improved.<br />
As noted in Chapter IV, not all material is needed immediately, and material<br />
needed only within two days (the regional goal) might be provided<br />
more efficiently from a regional facility than from individual campuses.<br />
Some additional construction <strong>of</strong> traditional open-stack library facilities<br />
on campuses will still be necessary to accommodate the material likely<br />
to be used frequently, but the amount <strong>of</strong> such construction will be much<br />
less than without the regional facilities. <strong>The</strong> regional facilities<br />
could also be used by CSUC and other institutions on a cost-sharing<br />
basis.<br />
More extensive use <strong>of</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>orms under one set <strong>of</strong> circumstances<br />
also appears to be advisable. If a micr<strong>of</strong>orm edition <strong>of</strong> a current journal<br />
is available, and is suitable <strong>for</strong> research use in micr<strong>of</strong>orm, several<br />
benefits resulting from procuring the micr<strong>of</strong>orm edition and retaining it<br />
in lieu <strong>of</strong> binding the originals. Space is saved; binding costs are<br />
eliminated; the possibility <strong>of</strong> theft is sharply reduced; the material