The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
84 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />
In the experience <strong>of</strong> other institutions that have used the particular<br />
system being installed by the <strong>University</strong>, it can be operated without<br />
increased costs, and even with some savings, but there are start-up<br />
costs associated with purchase and installation <strong>of</strong> the equipment. <strong>The</strong><br />
exact costs vary from campus to campus because <strong>of</strong> the varying number<br />
<strong>of</strong> terminals required and differences in the size <strong>of</strong> the files that<br />
must be maintained, but the average installation cost is approximately<br />
$200,000. Under the policy adopted in 1976, half <strong>of</strong> the start-up costs<br />
are budgeted systemwide, and half by the campuses. For this purpose,<br />
then, $300,000 should be budgeted in 1978/79, and $100,000 in 1979/80,<br />
<strong>for</strong> purchase and installation <strong>of</strong> automated circulation systems on the<br />
remaining campuses.<br />
Loan Periods. <strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> loan periods on the availability <strong>of</strong><br />
library materials at the campus level must also be considered. Buckland<br />
has noted that "<strong>for</strong> the individual borrower, a loan period is<br />
desirable," but<br />
<strong>for</strong> everybody else, this borrower's lengthy loan period is<br />
inconvenient because there is always some probability that<br />
someone else may want that particular book. <strong>The</strong> longer the<br />
borrower retains it, the longer it is absent from the shelf<br />
and the less chance anyone else has <strong>of</strong> finding it immediately<br />
when they want it. For everyone, except the borrower,<br />
a shorter loan period is more convenient. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />
every library user plays both the role <strong>of</strong> borrower and the<br />
role <strong>of</strong> "everybody else" does not remove this conflict <strong>of</strong><br />
interest. 5<br />
<strong>The</strong> problem is complicated, he notes further, by several factors:<br />
1. "<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> demand varies enormously from book to book<br />
or, to put it another way, the probability that a book will be sought<br />
whilst it is out on loan varies greatly."<br />
2. "Inducing the borrower to return a book soon is not the only<br />
way <strong>of</strong> reducing the frustration <strong>of</strong> other would-be borrowers because<br />
one can always provide another copy. Duplication is clearly on<br />
acceptable alternative strategy."<br />
5 Michael K. Buckland, Book Availability and the Library User,<br />
Pergamon Press, 1975, pp. 55-56.