19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />

the data base. Other libraries have been added since that time, some<br />

using teletype equipment and others using visual display terminals<br />

through the TYMNET commercial communications system, or over regular<br />

telephone lines. In <strong>1977</strong>, there were 33 institutions using the system<br />

to one degree or another.<br />

<strong>The</strong> data base <strong>for</strong> the system consists primarily <strong>of</strong> MARC records<br />

and records added by Stan<strong>for</strong>d's cataloging staff. Until July 1976,<br />

shared cataloging was not possible, because the system could not<br />

accept and store records from other institutions. Beginning in that<br />

month, however, UC Berkeley became the first library outside Stan<strong>for</strong>d<br />

to make use <strong>of</strong> the system on a shared cataloging basis, adding records<br />

to the file and (through the use <strong>of</strong> a program contributed by the <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong>'s <strong>University</strong>wide Library Automation Program)<br />

receiving catalog records in return, much as in the OCLC system. By<br />

<strong>1977</strong>, 24 libraries were on-line to BALLOTS, cataloging approximately<br />

5,000 titles per week.<br />

<strong>The</strong> greatest strength <strong>of</strong> the BALLOTS system is its ability to<br />

allow searching by a wide variety <strong>of</strong> data elements, using so-called<br />

"natural language"--that is, the actual words <strong>of</strong> a title or author,<br />

or truncated portions <strong>of</strong> them--and to combine these elements with<br />

other data elements in a "Boolean" search technique, as described<br />

in Chapter V. Subject searches can also be made, a capacity that<br />

OCLC as not yet incorporated. Like OCLC, however, BALLOTS also has<br />

its problems. It, too, has occasionally been plagued with poor response<br />

time, although in the case <strong>of</strong> BALLOTS this stems from a different<br />

source which is itself a problem: the fact that the system<br />

must share a large computer which at any one time is processing a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> other jobs <strong>for</strong> Stan<strong>for</strong>d <strong>University</strong>. <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

base is much smaller than OCLC's, although academic libraries that<br />

have used both find almost as high a percentage <strong>of</strong> records desired<br />

in BALLOTS as in OCLC. As BALLOTS has emerged to network status,<br />

its costs have been difficult to pinpoint, and only recently have<br />

libraries been able to obtain firm prices in library terms--that is,<br />

per catalog card or title cataloged. New rates were announced in<br />

July 1976, however, and as the system develops its network organization<br />

and equipment this situation may be expected to stabilize.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!