The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
130 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />
Cataloging. In operations such as cataloging, the use <strong>of</strong> such<br />
systems can help reduce costs even more substantially. <strong>The</strong> most successful<br />
on-line systems allow dozens and even hundreds <strong>of</strong> libraries to<br />
share the work, so that only one library need catalog a title and the<br />
rest can use the results without having to repeat the ef<strong>for</strong>t. In one<br />
recent study <strong>of</strong> the largest such system (the Ohio College Library<br />
Center), 91 percent <strong>of</strong> the users queried felt that the system allowed<br />
catalogers to produce more work per unit <strong>of</strong> time, and 95 percent said<br />
that clerical workers could increase production per unit <strong>of</strong> time. 20 In<br />
another recent study, which covered all <strong>of</strong> the 47 original members <strong>of</strong><br />
OCLC, the author concluded that "original" cataloging had been all but<br />
eliminated <strong>for</strong> the smaller libraries, and reduced to well below 20<br />
percent <strong>of</strong> the total cataloging ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>for</strong> other types. <strong>The</strong> time<br />
required to catalog books and to produce sets <strong>of</strong> catalog cards had<br />
been reduced in 91 percent <strong>of</strong> these libraries. 21<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> libraries are now experimenting<br />
with two such systems, OCLC and a similar but smaller system based<br />
at Stan<strong>for</strong>d <strong>University</strong>, called BALLOTS (<strong>for</strong> Bibliographic Automation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Large <strong>Libraries</strong> using an On-line Time-sharing System). <strong>The</strong> Ohio<br />
College Library Center began as a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it corporation in 1967.<br />
On-line cataloging services began in August 1971, and the number <strong>of</strong><br />
users has grown steadily since that time. In 1973, the OCLC membership<br />
voted to allow libraries outside <strong>of</strong> Ohio to participate, and at<br />
present the system is used by over 800 libraries in 44 states. In<br />
the data base are almost 3 million records, including all <strong>of</strong> the MARC<br />
(Machine-Readable Cataloging) records from the Library <strong>of</strong> Congress.<br />
Participants key in a few letters or numbers (typically a few letters<br />
<strong>of</strong> the author's name and a few letters <strong>of</strong> the title) <strong>for</strong> the<br />
work they wish to process, and in a few seconds records corresponding<br />
to this "search key" are displayed on the screen <strong>of</strong> the terminal.<br />
20<br />
Barbara Evans Markuson, "<strong>The</strong> Ohio College Library Center,"<br />
Library Technology Reports, v. 12, no. 1 (January 1976), pp. 92-93.<br />
21<br />
Joe A. Hewitt, "<strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> OCLC," American <strong>Libraries</strong>, v. 7,<br />
no. 5 (May 1976), pp. 272-273.