19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />

Cataloging. In operations such as cataloging, the use <strong>of</strong> such<br />

systems can help reduce costs even more substantially. <strong>The</strong> most successful<br />

on-line systems allow dozens and even hundreds <strong>of</strong> libraries to<br />

share the work, so that only one library need catalog a title and the<br />

rest can use the results without having to repeat the ef<strong>for</strong>t. In one<br />

recent study <strong>of</strong> the largest such system (the Ohio College Library<br />

Center), 91 percent <strong>of</strong> the users queried felt that the system allowed<br />

catalogers to produce more work per unit <strong>of</strong> time, and 95 percent said<br />

that clerical workers could increase production per unit <strong>of</strong> time. 20 In<br />

another recent study, which covered all <strong>of</strong> the 47 original members <strong>of</strong><br />

OCLC, the author concluded that "original" cataloging had been all but<br />

eliminated <strong>for</strong> the smaller libraries, and reduced to well below 20<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> the total cataloging ef<strong>for</strong>t <strong>for</strong> other types. <strong>The</strong> time<br />

required to catalog books and to produce sets <strong>of</strong> catalog cards had<br />

been reduced in 91 percent <strong>of</strong> these libraries. 21<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> libraries are now experimenting<br />

with two such systems, OCLC and a similar but smaller system based<br />

at Stan<strong>for</strong>d <strong>University</strong>, called BALLOTS (<strong>for</strong> Bibliographic Automation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Large <strong>Libraries</strong> using an On-line Time-sharing System). <strong>The</strong> Ohio<br />

College Library Center began as a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it corporation in 1967.<br />

On-line cataloging services began in August 1971, and the number <strong>of</strong><br />

users has grown steadily since that time. In 1973, the OCLC membership<br />

voted to allow libraries outside <strong>of</strong> Ohio to participate, and at<br />

present the system is used by over 800 libraries in 44 states. In<br />

the data base are almost 3 million records, including all <strong>of</strong> the MARC<br />

(Machine-Readable Cataloging) records from the Library <strong>of</strong> Congress.<br />

Participants key in a few letters or numbers (typically a few letters<br />

<strong>of</strong> the author's name and a few letters <strong>of</strong> the title) <strong>for</strong> the<br />

work they wish to process, and in a few seconds records corresponding<br />

to this "search key" are displayed on the screen <strong>of</strong> the terminal.<br />

20<br />

Barbara Evans Markuson, "<strong>The</strong> Ohio College Library Center,"<br />

Library Technology Reports, v. 12, no. 1 (January 1976), pp. 92-93.<br />

21<br />

Joe A. Hewitt, "<strong>The</strong> Impact <strong>of</strong> OCLC," American <strong>Libraries</strong>, v. 7,<br />

no. 5 (May 1976), pp. 272-273.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!