19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />

has been used by the State <strong>for</strong> space planning in the past. Actual FTE<br />

figures are multiplied by 1.25, and the result is then multiplied by<br />

135 assignable square feet (asf) to arrive at the space allotment.<br />

Simplified, this results in 168.75 asf per actual FTE staff. It<br />

should be noted that this allowance is intended to cover not only the<br />

actual work stations <strong>of</strong> the staff, but all space <strong>for</strong> library materials<br />

being processed, work rooms, storage <strong>of</strong> supplies, equipment,<br />

public service desks, and indeed any assignable areas not covered by<br />

provisions <strong>for</strong> users and library materials.<br />

<strong>The</strong> actual FTE staff and the assignable square feet that would<br />

be required <strong>for</strong> staff according to this <strong>for</strong>mula, from <strong>1977</strong>/78 to<br />

1987/88, are shown in Table 22. <strong>The</strong> third column indicates the space<br />

requirements if the staff grows according to the same pattern as<br />

research libraries in the past (as discussed in Chapter IX), and the<br />

fifth column indicates the space required <strong>for</strong> staff as projected by<br />

this plan.<br />

Space <strong>for</strong> Library Users. For users, the alternatives are fairly<br />

simple, and are based on decisions as to what proportion <strong>of</strong> the potential<br />

number <strong>of</strong> users to provide seating <strong>for</strong>. Most <strong>for</strong>mulas used by<br />

libraries and state planning agencies <strong>for</strong> this purpose are expressed<br />

simply as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the student body, ignoring faculty, university<br />

staff, and members <strong>of</strong> the public as users. <strong>The</strong> square footage<br />

allotted per user will <strong>of</strong> course depend on the type <strong>of</strong> seating provided,<br />

and may range from 25 asf <strong>for</strong> seating at tables, to 75 or 100<br />

asf <strong>for</strong> faculty studies, if the latter are provided <strong>for</strong> separately.<br />

In practice, libraries vary in the percentage <strong>of</strong> the student<br />

body <strong>for</strong> whom seats are actually provided, ranging from 10 percent in<br />

the case <strong>of</strong> some commuter colleges to 40 percent or more in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> some residential universities. <strong>Plan</strong>ning guides used by the <strong>University</strong><br />

and the State in the past have been based on 25 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

the student body, and this is the figure most <strong>of</strong>ten recommended by<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional library building consultants. <strong>The</strong> calculations in the<br />

plan there<strong>for</strong>e assume that seating will be provided <strong>for</strong> 25 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the three-term average head count enrollment, and that 25 asf will

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!