The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
134 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />
also is able to have its serial records edited and checked against<br />
the authority files at the Library <strong>of</strong> Congress. <strong>The</strong> result <strong>of</strong> these<br />
two programs will be a consistent and authoritative, continuously updated<br />
file <strong>of</strong> serial in<strong>for</strong>mation which can be used by library staff<br />
<strong>for</strong> processing serial titles and consulted by the libraries' users.<br />
In the experience <strong>of</strong> some libraries, automation can also improve<br />
the efficiency <strong>of</strong> several time-consuming and costly clerical procedures<br />
involved in the handling <strong>of</strong> individual serial issues. Work on<br />
a serials-handling system <strong>for</strong> the <strong>University</strong> at large has been deferred,<br />
however, because it appears that this capability may be<br />
available from other sources. <strong>The</strong> Ohio College Library Center has<br />
planned <strong>for</strong> several years to make such a service available to OCLC<br />
participants, and some institutions are already using a pilot version<br />
<strong>of</strong> the service. If the <strong>University</strong> decides to use OCLC <strong>for</strong> cataloging,<br />
it will naturally give serious consideration to using the serials-handling<br />
service as well. <strong>The</strong> Research <strong>Libraries</strong> Group (Harvard,<br />
Yale, Columbia, and the New York Public Library) has also expressed<br />
interest in developing a serials-handling system in cooperation with<br />
the <strong>University</strong>, as has BALLOTS. If none <strong>of</strong> these alternatives appears<br />
feasible, a final possibility to be explored is the re-design<br />
and re-programming <strong>of</strong> the system developed by the UCLA Biomedical<br />
Library and used there successfully <strong>for</strong> several years.<br />
Acquisition Procedures. Automation <strong>of</strong> acquisition procedures<br />
on a systemwide basis has also been deferred, <strong>for</strong> similar reasons.<br />
If the <strong>University</strong> decides to use BALLOTS <strong>for</strong> cataloging, it should<br />
also be possible to use the acquisition program already developed<br />
as a part <strong>of</strong> that system. OCLC has also been developing programs<br />
to handle acquisition routines, which might be used if OCLC is<br />
chosen <strong>for</strong> cataloging (one study <strong>of</strong> OCLC found that 76 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> those libraries surveyed already use the system <strong>for</strong> pre-order<br />
searching, even though such in<strong>for</strong>mation as whether the book is in<br />
print or does not appear in the record). If neither <strong>of</strong> these<br />
alternatives provides a feasible system, a third possibility to be<br />
explored is the further development <strong>of</strong> a system designed by the UC<br />
Irvine library and already used <strong>for</strong> accounting purposes at UCLA and<br />
UC Santa Barbara.