19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

X. Housing 169<br />

Third! (<strong>The</strong>re is a happy ending--the Folio was recovered some 280<br />

years later, although at a fairly substantial price.) Most librarians<br />

<strong>of</strong> any experience can relate similar if less dramatic examples.<br />

In order to avoid the likelihood <strong>of</strong> intellectual tragedies, then,<br />

it appears essential that all items selected <strong>for</strong> discard be reviewed,<br />

preferably by "an intelligent, humane, book-loving librarian" who has<br />

at least "a touch <strong>of</strong> the Alexandrian tradition." 3 <strong>The</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> this<br />

review is estimated at $.70 per volume, 4 so the total processing cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> each volume considered <strong>for</strong> weeding becomes $1.70. For the<br />

5,758,000 volumes involved, this amounts to $9,788,000. It was assumed,<br />

somewhat conservatively, that perhaps 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the items<br />

considered <strong>for</strong> weeding would be retained, so the predicted number <strong>of</strong><br />

volumes to be discarded becomes 4,606,400. <strong>The</strong> volumes not discarded<br />

will <strong>of</strong> course add to the amount <strong>of</strong> additional construction needed on<br />

campus, and this raises the total cost <strong>of</strong> the weeding alternative to<br />

$56,384,000. This is still a substantial savings over the "base<br />

case"--an estimated $33,046,000--but as noted below there appear to<br />

be even more economical and attractive alternatives that do not involve<br />

the risks inherent in weeding. <strong>The</strong> weeding alternative is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e not recommended.<br />

Differential Housing. <strong>The</strong> final approach to be considered is a<br />

differentiated approach to shelving <strong>of</strong> the materials. Fussler and<br />

Simon note that "it has long been assumed in American university libraries<br />

that all books not actually in use should be immediately<br />

available and shelved with all other books on the subject," but that<br />

this "presumed necessity <strong>for</strong> the immediate availability <strong>of</strong> books may<br />

deserve closer examination when the cost <strong>of</strong> providing it is compared<br />

with possible alternatives." 5<br />

3<br />

Ray L. Hefner, quoted in Robin Wilson, "Must We Burn Our Books?", p.<br />

24.<br />

4<br />

Based on calculations in Lee Ash, Yale's Selective Book Retirement<br />

Program, Shoestring Press, 1963, pp. 48-49.<br />

5<br />

Herman H. Fussler and Julian L. Simon, Patterns in the Use <strong>of</strong> Books in<br />

Large Research <strong>Libraries</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1969, pp.<br />

1-2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!