The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 27 160 The University of California Libraries Total New Library Space (ASF) Required, 1977-1988 Assuming On-Campus, Open-Stack Facilities, and Staffing Recommended in the Plan Total, All Campuses Santa Cruz Santa Barbara San Francisco San Diego Riverside Los Angeles Irvine Davis Berkeley Year 249,000 16,000 81,000 18,000 20,000 114,000 1977/78 299,000 5,000 18,000 3,000 94,000 24,000 27,000 128,000 1978/79 353,000 3,000 13,000 20,000 10,000 108,000 24,000 35,000 140,000 1979/80 368,000 07,000 19,000 23,000 10,000 5,000 109,000 31,000 43,000 121,000 1980/81 431,000 12,000 25,000 24,000 17,000 8,000 122,000 36,000 51,000 136,000 1981/82 496,000 16,000 31,000 26,000 23,000 12,000 136,000 41,000 59,000 152,000 1982/83 561,000 21,000 38,000 28,000 29,000 16,000 149,000 45,000 67,000 168,000 1983/84 622,000 25,000 44,000 29,000 35,000 20,000 162,000 49,000 74,000 184,000 1984/85 685,000 29,000 50,000 21,000 41,000 24,000 175,000 54,000 81,000 200,000 1985/86 474,000 33,000 56,000 32,000 48,000 27,000 189,000 58,000 88,000 216,000 1986/87 808,000 37,000 62,000 34,000 54,000 31,000 202,000 62,000 95,000 231,000 1987/88
X. Housing 161 asf, the low figure representing new building, and the higher representing additions to existing buildings. For libraries on campuses in the North, the comparable costs are estimated to be approximately 10 percent higher. These costs, it should be noted, do not include any renovation of existing structures to correct seismic deficiencies, nor do they include the cost of land, which for purposes of this calculation is assumed to be free. The cumulative costs of this alternative over the ten-year period in question are approximately $106,000,000, assuming continuation of past research library staffing patterns. With the staffing recommended in Chapter IX, the cumulative costs of this alternative are approximately $89,000,000 as indicated in Table 28. The latter figure is used as the "base case" in considering all other alternatives. Microform. The alternative of storing library materials in microform has been discussed (and practiced) for many years. Scholars are now accustomed to using newspapers in this form, and seconddary schools and colleges are making increasing use of periodicals in microform as well. There is still a substantial amount of user resistance to microforms in research libraries because of a variety of problems in the production of the material and the design of readers for using it, 2 but this resistance appears to be lessening. The big advantage of microform, however, is that the space required for storage of the material is substantially reduced, so it is obviously worthwhile to examine the possibility that increased use of microforms might help alleviate the library space problem and reduce the costs of housing library materials. There are various ways in which such a strategy might be pursued, and the research team examined three of them. The first and most radical would be to convert to microform all volumes that could 2 For an analysis of these problems, see Stephen R. Salmon, "User Resistance to Microforms in the Research Library," Microform Review, v. 3, no. 3 (July 1974), pp. 194-199.
Page 1:
A PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT Office of th
Page 5 and 6:
PREFACE The first draft of the plan
Page 7:
goals of the library system on a mu
Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER I THE UNIVERSITY AND ITS LI
Page 13 and 14:
I. The University and Its Libraries
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER II THE FUNCTION OF THE LIBR
Page 39 and 40:
II. The Function of the Library 29
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER III THE NEED FOR A NEW APPR
Page 47 and 48:
III. The Need for a New Approach 37
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
CHAPTER IV A UNIVERSITY LIBRARY SYS
Page 57 and 58:
IV. A University Library System 47
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
CHAPTER V IDENTIFICATION AND LOCATI
Page 69 and 70:
V. Identification and Location 59
Page 71 and 72:
V. Identification and Location 61 e
Page 73 and 74:
V. Identification and Location 63 a
Page 75 and 76:
V. Identification and Location 65 i
Page 77 and 78:
V. Identification and Location 67 1
Page 79 and 80:
V. Identification and Location 69 c
Page 81 and 82:
V. Identification and Location 71 B
Page 83 and 84:
V. Identification and Location 73 t
Page 85 and 86:
V. Identification and Location 75 o
Page 87 and 88:
V. Identification and Location 77 N
Page 89 and 90:
CHAPTER VI DELIVERY AND USE OF MATE
Page 91 and 92:
VI. Delivery and Use 81 At the depa
Page 93 and 94:
VI. Delivery and Use 83 which they
Page 95 and 96:
VI. Delivery and Use 85 3. "If the
Page 97 and 98:
VI. Delivery and Use 87 At the camp
Page 99 and 100:
VI. Delivery and Use 89 The allocat
Page 101 and 102:
VI. Delivery and Use 91 In the mean
Page 103 and 104:
VI. Delivery and Use 93 2) That int
Page 105 and 106:
VI. Delivery and Use 95 At the syst
Page 107 and 108:
VI. Delivery and Use 97 Several alt
Page 109 and 110:
VI. Delivery and Use 99 its develop
Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER VII INFORMATION AND INSTRUC
Page 113 and 114:
VII. Information and Instruction 10
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120: VII. Information and Instruction 10
Page 121 and 122: VII. Information and Instruction 11
Page 123 and 124: CHAPTER VIII ACQUISITION AND PROCES
Page 125 and 126: VIII. Acquisition and Processing 11
Page 129 and 130: Table 15 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA M
Page 145: VIII. Acquisition and Processing 13
Page 148 and 149: 138 The University of California Li
Page 157 and 158: CHAPTER X HOUSING THE LIBRARY SYSTE
Page 159 and 160: X. Housing 149 The shortage of spac
Page 161 and 162: X. Housing 151 visited each campus,
Page 163 and 164: X. Housing 153 Year Actual FTE Staf
Page 165 and 166: Table 23 X. Housing 155 Space Requi
Page 167 and 168: X. Housing 157 Total, All Campuses
Page 169: X. Housing 159 Table 26 Total New L
Page 173 and 174: X. Housing 163 not be housed in exi
Page 175 and 176: X. Housing 165 Table 30 Cost of Sub
Page 177 and 178: X. Housing 167 that are meant. Howe
Page 179 and 180: X. Housing 169 Third! (There is a h
Page 181 and 182: X. Housing 171 that "past use" is "
Page 183 and 184: X. Housing 173 Table 32 Costs of Sh
Page 185 and 186: X. Housing 175 monographs, on the o
Page 187 and 188: X. Housing 177 For the purposes of
Page 189 and 190: X. Housing 179 degree of overlap be
Page 191 and 192: X. Housing 181 • that brief bibli
Page 193 and 194: X. Housing 183 Region. The principa
Page 195: X. Housing 185 Table 35 Estimated N
Page 220:
210 The University of California Li
show all

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?