The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
X. Housing 179<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> overlap between collections within a region, and within<br />
categories <strong>of</strong> recorded use. Based on the estimates <strong>of</strong> overlap in the<br />
eligible categories, it appears that the volumes placed in compact<br />
shelving in the North could be reduced by approximately 11.5 percent,<br />
and in the South by 29 percent. <strong>The</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> this alternative are<br />
accordingly reduced to $54,488,000 if the facilities are built <strong>of</strong>f<br />
campus, or $56,532,000 if on campus, with savings over the "base case"<br />
<strong>of</strong> $34,942,000 and $32,898,000, respectively.<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> Location. At this point it will be noted that<br />
the difference in cost between the <strong>of</strong>f-campus and on-campus alternatives<br />
is less than four percent. This is a relatively small amount,<br />
and might be <strong>of</strong>fset by other considerations in determining the actual<br />
sites <strong>of</strong> the regional facilities. Indeed, there are several factors<br />
that must be taken into consideration be<strong>for</strong>e specific locations <strong>of</strong><br />
the facilities can be recommended: availability <strong>of</strong> space on particular<br />
campuses, costs <strong>of</strong> transportation to and from the facility from<br />
each campus in the region, actual land costs <strong>for</strong> particular locations<br />
and so on. Final determination <strong>of</strong> the sites should be made by detailed<br />
feasibility studies, and funds <strong>for</strong> these studies will be requested in<br />
the 1978/79 budget. Pending completion <strong>of</strong> these studies, the plan uses<br />
the average costs <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-campus facilities, both in the North and the<br />
South, in the recommendations which follow.<br />
Recommendations. <strong>The</strong> total costs <strong>of</strong> all alternatives may now be<br />
calculated, and are summarized in Table 34. Based on the costs shown,<br />
and the considerations discussed above, the plan recommends a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the alternatives in the columns marked "I" and "E". Specifically,<br />
• that two regional compact shelving facilities be constructed,<br />
one in the North and one in the South;<br />
• that the site <strong>of</strong> the facilities be determined by detailed<br />
feasibility studies;<br />
• that material in them be double-shelved, initially in call<br />
number sequence;