19.07.2013 Views

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

X. Housing 179<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> overlap between collections within a region, and within<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> recorded use. Based on the estimates <strong>of</strong> overlap in the<br />

eligible categories, it appears that the volumes placed in compact<br />

shelving in the North could be reduced by approximately 11.5 percent,<br />

and in the South by 29 percent. <strong>The</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> this alternative are<br />

accordingly reduced to $54,488,000 if the facilities are built <strong>of</strong>f<br />

campus, or $56,532,000 if on campus, with savings over the "base case"<br />

<strong>of</strong> $34,942,000 and $32,898,000, respectively.<br />

Determination <strong>of</strong> Location. At this point it will be noted that<br />

the difference in cost between the <strong>of</strong>f-campus and on-campus alternatives<br />

is less than four percent. This is a relatively small amount,<br />

and might be <strong>of</strong>fset by other considerations in determining the actual<br />

sites <strong>of</strong> the regional facilities. Indeed, there are several factors<br />

that must be taken into consideration be<strong>for</strong>e specific locations <strong>of</strong><br />

the facilities can be recommended: availability <strong>of</strong> space on particular<br />

campuses, costs <strong>of</strong> transportation to and from the facility from<br />

each campus in the region, actual land costs <strong>for</strong> particular locations<br />

and so on. Final determination <strong>of</strong> the sites should be made by detailed<br />

feasibility studies, and funds <strong>for</strong> these studies will be requested in<br />

the 1978/79 budget. Pending completion <strong>of</strong> these studies, the plan uses<br />

the average costs <strong>for</strong> <strong>of</strong>f-campus facilities, both in the North and the<br />

South, in the recommendations which follow.<br />

Recommendations. <strong>The</strong> total costs <strong>of</strong> all alternatives may now be<br />

calculated, and are summarized in Table 34. Based on the costs shown,<br />

and the considerations discussed above, the plan recommends a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> the alternatives in the columns marked "I" and "E". Specifically,<br />

• that two regional compact shelving facilities be constructed,<br />

one in the North and one in the South;<br />

• that the site <strong>of</strong> the facilities be determined by detailed<br />

feasibility studies;<br />

• that material in them be double-shelved, initially in call<br />

number sequence;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!