The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
The University of California Libraries: A Plan for Development (1977)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
124 <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Libraries</strong><br />
areas <strong>of</strong> library activity, and several particular concerns are noted<br />
below as they pertain to specific areas:<br />
Branch. Projections <strong>of</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> individual branch libraries<br />
are not given, because many will remain at a relatively constant size,<br />
transferring materials less frequently needed to the main campus collection,<br />
or to a regional facility. However, if the system is to meet<br />
its per<strong>for</strong>mance objectives at this level--that is, to provide access<br />
to materials needed immediately--a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the book<br />
funds must be spent <strong>for</strong> branch library collections. An indication <strong>of</strong><br />
the need is given by statistics kept on the Berkeley campus in connection<br />
with the processing <strong>of</strong> materials. Over a two-year period, 25 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the book purchase orders processed were accompanied by a request<br />
that the material be <strong>for</strong>warded immediately to the ordering unit<br />
without cataloging; in other words, the material was needed immediately,<br />
and even the delay imposed by the cataloging process was unacceptable.<br />
It is also clear that some <strong>of</strong> the need <strong>for</strong> materials in branch<br />
libraries cannot be met at current acquisition levels. This becomes<br />
an especially serious problem when the branch library is physically<br />
remote from related collections. A letter from the chairman <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Division <strong>of</strong> Mental Health in the Sacramento Medical Center to the<br />
UC Davis Health Sciences Librarian, quoted in part below, provides<br />
a specific and poignant example:<br />
Your memo highlights one <strong>of</strong> the major problems <strong>of</strong> a split campus<br />
between the basic sciences and the clinical sciences. <strong>The</strong><br />
lack <strong>of</strong> adequate library facilities at Sacramento has been a<br />
major disadvantage to education programs <strong>for</strong> medical students<br />
and <strong>for</strong> house <strong>of</strong>ficers. In our own field, we have, in any giv-<br />
en time, 30 psychiatric residents, 4 child psychiatry fellows,<br />
6 clinical psychology interns, 12 medical students, 25 social<br />
work and nursing students, and somewhere between 75 and 90 students<br />
on other electives. <strong>The</strong> collection in the mental health<br />
sciences at Davis is magnificent. <strong>The</strong> collection at Sacramen-<br />
to is pitifully small. We have tried to make up <strong>for</strong> this with<br />
a tiny Departmental library (assembled at our own expense),<br />
the psychoanalytic index (generously funded by you) and by the<br />
psychiatry collection in the health sciences library here...<br />
Although we cannot hope to duplicate the total Davis campus<br />
health sciences collection here at Sacramento, a large part<br />
<strong>of</strong> it simply must be available if the students and clinicians<br />
are not to be seriously deprived in this regard. Nothing is