31.07.2013 Views

Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society - Climate Science ...

Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society - Climate Science ...

Hurricanes: Their Nature and Impacts on Society - Climate Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

168 HURRICANES: THEIR NATURE AND IMPACf ON SOCIETY<br />

of building supplies following Andrew. With higher dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for building<br />

materials, prices went up <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rebuilding slowed. As a result of homes left in a<br />

damaged state during the rains <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> resultant water damage to structures that<br />

followed Andrew, "partial losses went from bad to worse, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> many became<br />

total losses", further increasing the costs of Hurricane Andrew to the insurance<br />

industry (No<strong>on</strong>an 1993). An interesting questi<strong>on</strong> is whether these costs ought to<br />

be attributed to Hugo or Andrew.<br />

Hurricane Andrew provided some with ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits. Two weeks after<br />

the storm The Miami Herald announced that "The gold rush is <strong>on</strong>" as job<br />

seekers flooded south Florida (Alvarez 1 992b). To some in the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong><br />

industry the storm came to be known as 'CSt Andrew" due to the dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> that it left in its wake (No<strong>on</strong>an 1993). The Miami city government<br />

expected a net financial gain due to the storm's sec<strong>on</strong>d- <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> third-order<br />

impacts (fanfani 1992). Clearly a number of public <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> private groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

organizati<strong>on</strong>s profited significantly from the storm's passage.<br />

Although Andrew devastated South Dade County, "the hurricane's impact<br />

<strong>on</strong> Dade's ec<strong>on</strong>omy could have been much worse," according to a report by<br />

the county's planning office (Filkins 1992). Andrew's path of most severe<br />

damage took it well south of the area that generates the most ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

activity. Figure 7.2 shows how close Andrew came to being a much worse<br />

impact. The bulk of Dade County's businesses were not dramatically affected,<br />

which facilitated recovery. However, while the county planners expected a<br />

healthy recovery for Dade County in terms of aggregate ec<strong>on</strong>omic indicators,<br />

they were much less sanguine about the future of southern Dade County,<br />

where Andrew had hit the hardest. They feared that communities such as<br />

Homestead would never fully recover.<br />

Casualties<br />

Difficulties in determinati<strong>on</strong> of a hurricane's ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact are also present<br />

in attributi<strong>on</strong> of casualties to a hurricane (cf. Garcia, Neal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tanfani 1992).<br />

There are casualties directly associated with a hurricane, such as drowning due<br />

to a storm surge. There are also casualties that are indirectly related to a<br />

hurricane, such as a heart attack during the storm or being struck by lightning<br />

while sorting through damages in the days following the event.<br />

The DOC Disaster Assessment attributed 14 deaths directly to Andrew's<br />

l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>fall in south Florida (DOC 1993). A FEMA assessment attributed 40<br />

direct <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> indirect deaths to the storm (FEMA 1993). Hundreds of people<br />

were injured (DOC 1993). That there were not more casualties is partly due to<br />

good fortune, but also largely a result of l<strong>on</strong>g- <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> short-term preparedness<br />

efforts. The relatively low loss of life in Florida should not be interpreted to<br />

mean that future hurricanes do not have potential to take a large number of<br />

lives. As experts note, large loss of life is a c<strong>on</strong>stant threat from l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>falling

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!