04.08.2013 Views

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter 2: performance at international benchmarks<br />

Exhibit 2.15 Exhibit <strong>PIRLS</strong> 2.15: 2006 <strong>PIRLS</strong> High 2006 International High International Benchmark Benchmark – Item 9 – – Item Literary 9 – Literary Example Example<br />

Purpose : Literary Experience<br />

1 Point: Sample Correct Response<br />

† Met guidelines for sample participation rates only after replacement schools were<br />

included (see Exhibit A.7).<br />

‡ Nearly satisfying guidelines for sample participation rates after replacement schools<br />

were included (see Exhibit A.7).<br />

2a National Defined Population covers less than 95% of National Desired Population<br />

(see Exhibit A.4).<br />

Country<br />

Percent<br />

Correct<br />

93<br />

<strong>PIRLS</strong> 2006<br />

4th Grade<br />

† Netherl<strong>and</strong>s 84 (1.3) h<br />

†2a Belgium (Flemish) 80 (1.4) h<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> 77 (1.5) h<br />

2a Canada, British Columbia 77 (1.7) h<br />

2a Canada, Alberta 76 (1.6) h<br />

2a Canada, Ontario 75 (1.8) h<br />

Hungary 75 (1.9) h<br />

Canada, Nova Scotia 74 (1.7) h<br />

†2a United States 71 (1.8) h<br />

Lithuania 71 (1.8) h<br />

† Scotl<strong>and</strong> 70 (2.1) h<br />

Singapore 70 (1.6) h<br />

Sweden 69 (2.0) h<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 68 (1.6) h<br />

Slovak Republic 66 (1.8) h<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 66 (1.5) h<br />

Latvia 63 (2.4) h<br />

Germany 62 (2.0) h<br />

Italy 62 (2.0) h<br />

‡ Norway 59 (2.7)<br />

Chinese Taipei 59 (1.8) h<br />

Luxembourg 59 (1.5) h<br />

2a Russian Federation 58 (1.7) h<br />

France 58 (1.9) h<br />

2a Denmark 58 (1.9)<br />

2b Israel 58 (2.0)<br />

Belgium (French) 58 (1.9)<br />

Hong Kong SAR 57 (1.7)<br />

Icel<strong>and</strong> 57 (1.9)<br />

Canada, Quebec 56 (2.2)<br />

Slovenia 56 (1.7)<br />

International Avg. 55 (0.3)<br />

Romania 54 (1.9)<br />

Moldova, Rep. of 51 (2.5)<br />

Spain 48 (2.0) i<br />

Austria 47 (1.7) i<br />

2a Bulgaria 42 (2.5) i<br />

2a Georgia 39 (2.9) i<br />

Trinidad <strong>and</strong> Tobago 38 (1.9) i<br />

Macedonia, Rep. of 36 (1.8) i<br />

Iran, Islamic Rep. of 34 (1.7) i<br />

South Africa 24 (1.4) i<br />

Qatar 24 (1.3) i<br />

Morocco 20 (1.7) i<br />

Kuwait 20 (1.6) i<br />

Indonesia 17 (1.5) i<br />

Percentage of students answering correctly<br />

significantly higher than international average h<br />

Percentage of students answering correctly<br />

significantly lower than international average I<br />

2b National Defined Population covers less than 80% of National Desired Population<br />

(see Exhibit A.4).<br />

( ) St<strong>and</strong>ard errors appear in parentheses. Because results are rounded to the nearest<br />

whole number, some totals may appear inconsistent.<br />

NOTE: The International Average does not include the results from the Canadian provinces.<br />

SOURCE: IEA Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (<strong>PIRLS</strong>) 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!