04.08.2013 Views

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chapter 5: school curriculum <strong>and</strong> organization for teaching reading<br />

Exhibit 5.11 presents teachers’ reports of the number of hours weekly<br />

spent teaching reading, either formally or integrated as part of reading<br />

for other subjects. For each category of hours—more than 6, more than 3<br />

up to <strong>and</strong> including 6, <strong>and</strong> up to <strong>and</strong> including 3—the exhibit presents the<br />

percentage of students receiving that amount of weekly reading instruction<br />

in 2006, together with average reading achievement for those students. In<br />

addition, for countries that participated in <strong>PIRLS</strong> 2001, the exhibit presents the<br />

difference in the percent of students from 2001 <strong>and</strong> indicates if the difference<br />

was statistically significant. Countries are ordered according to the highest<br />

percentage of students receiving more than 6 hours of reading instruction<br />

each week.<br />

Internationally on average, about one fourth of the students were taught<br />

reading for more than 6 hours per week. In the United States, approximately<br />

two thirds of students were taught reading for more than 6 hours weekly.<br />

The percentage of students taught reading for more than 6 hours a week<br />

increased from 2001 in Hungary, Moldova, Bulgaria, France, Macedonia,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. Countries w<strong>here</strong> two thirds or more of students were<br />

taught reading for 3 hours or less per week included Slovenia, South Africa,<br />

Indonesia, Engl<strong>and</strong>, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, Austria, <strong>and</strong> Chinese Taipei.<br />

In Iran <strong>and</strong> Latvia, the percentage of students taught reading for 3 hours<br />

or less increased since 2001 by 38 <strong>and</strong> 30 percentage points, respectively.<br />

The <strong>PIRLS</strong> 2006 results show little, if any, relationship between amount of<br />

instructional time <strong>and</strong> reading achievement. This is a frequent research<br />

finding, because t<strong>here</strong> are many complex factors involved. For example,<br />

additional instruction often is provided to low-achieving students for<br />

remediation, <strong>and</strong> also, instructional time is not always spent in effective,<br />

productive ways.<br />

As shown in Exhibit 5.12, on average internationally 77 percent of<br />

students were in classrooms w<strong>here</strong> teachers reported explicitly spending<br />

time on formal reading instruction. More than 90 percent of students in<br />

Belgium (Flemish), Hungary, Luxembourg, Moldova, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, New<br />

Zeal<strong>and</strong>, the Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Trinidad <strong>and</strong> Tobago,<br />

179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!