04.08.2013 Views

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chapter 6: teachers <strong>and</strong> reading instruction<br />

For oral questioning <strong>and</strong> oral summary, teachers’ responses were<br />

averaged <strong>and</strong> combined as one reporting category. Similarly, teachers’<br />

responses for short-answer, <strong>and</strong> paragraph-length written responses were<br />

averaged to create a constructed-response category. Then, the response<br />

options of at least once a week <strong>and</strong> once or twice a month were combined.<br />

Exhibit 6.25 presents the summary of teachers’ responses regarding<br />

their approaches to assessing students’ reading performance. More than<br />

three fourths of students (78%), on average internationally, had teachers who<br />

listened to them read aloud at least weekly. Eighty-five percent had teachers<br />

who used oral assessment techniques (oral questioning or summary reports)<br />

at least weekly, <strong>and</strong> 63 percent had teachers who used written assessment<br />

(short or paragraph length). On average, multiple-choice questions were<br />

used with less than half the students (42%), but this varied considerably<br />

across countries.<br />

Two countries (Bulgaria <strong>and</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s) had increases from<br />

2001 in the percentage of students whose teachers listened to students<br />

read aloud, while only Icel<strong>and</strong> had a decrease (16 percentage points). The<br />

percentage of students whose teachers used oral questioning or summary<br />

reports to monitor students’ progress increased from 2001 in several<br />

countries, including Hungary, Icel<strong>and</strong>, Macedonia, New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, Norway,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Slovak Republic. Only in Latvia did the percentage decrease. The<br />

percentages of students assessed with multiple-choice questions increased<br />

from 2001 in Bulgaria, Germany, Morocco <strong>and</strong> the United States, w<strong>here</strong>as<br />

decreases occurred in France, the Slovak Republic, <strong>and</strong> Slovenia. Since 2001<br />

the percentage of students whose teachers asked them to write responses to<br />

what they read increased in Germany, Italy, <strong>and</strong> Latvia.<br />

Exhibit 6.26 presents teachers’ reports about how they use information<br />

from classroom assessment to make decisions about instruction. On average<br />

internationally, most students had teachers who used classroom assessment<br />

in reading to adapt instruction (91%), inform parents of students’ progress<br />

(92%), <strong>and</strong> identify students in need of remediation (91%). On average<br />

internationally, teachers used assessments for 72 percent of students to<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!