04.08.2013 Views

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

here - TIMSS and PIRLS Home - Boston College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 chapter 2: performance at international benchmarks<br />

Exhibit Exhibit 2.18 <strong>PIRLS</strong> 2.18: 2006 <strong>PIRLS</strong> High 2006 International High International Benchmark Benchmark – Item – 12 Item – Informational 12 – Informational Example Example<br />

Purpose : Acquire <strong>and</strong> Use Information<br />

1 Point: Sample Full-Credit Response<br />

† Met guidelines for sample participation rates only after replacement schools were<br />

included (see Exhibit A.7).<br />

‡ Nearly satisfying guidelines for sample participation rates after replacement schools<br />

were included (see Exhibit A.7).<br />

2a National Defined Population covers less than 95% of National Desired Population<br />

(see Exhibit A.4).<br />

Country<br />

<strong>PIRLS</strong> 2006<br />

4th Grade<br />

Percent<br />

Full<br />

Credit<br />

Singapore 83 (1.3) h<br />

Italy 74 (1.9) h<br />

2a Russian Federation 73 (2.0) h<br />

† Netherl<strong>and</strong>s 72 (2.1) h<br />

2a Canada, Ontario 71 (1.9) h<br />

2a Canada, British Columbia 71 (2.0) h<br />

†2a Belgium (Flemish) 69 (1.4) h<br />

2a Canada, Alberta 69 (1.8) h<br />

Sweden 69 (1.8) h<br />

Latvia 68 (2.1) h<br />

Lithuania 68 (1.9) h<br />

Hong Kong SAR 67 (1.7) h<br />

Austria 67 (1.9) h<br />

Germany 65 (1.9) h<br />

Luxembourg 64 (1.5) h<br />

†2a United States 63 (1.8) h<br />

Chinese Taipei 63 (1.5) h<br />

Hungary 63 (1.9) h<br />

2a Bulgaria 63 (2.8) h<br />

Canada, Nova Scotia 61 (1.9) h<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> 61 (1.9) h<br />

Spain 61 (1.8) h<br />

Slovenia 60 (1.7) h<br />

Slovak Republic 59 (2.1) h<br />

2a Denmark 59 (2.4)<br />

Icel<strong>and</strong> 58 (1.7) h<br />

France 58 (2.1)<br />

New Zeal<strong>and</strong> 57 (1.4)<br />

2b Israel 57 (2.1)<br />

Canada, Quebec 55 (2.2)<br />

† Scotl<strong>and</strong> 55 (2.1)<br />

International Avg. 55 (0.3)<br />

Romania 55 (2.4)<br />

Moldova, Rep. of 54 (2.7)<br />

‡ Norway 52 (2.2)<br />

Pol<strong>and</strong> 50 (1.9) i<br />

Belgium (French) 48 (2.0) i<br />

2a Georgia 47 (2.5) i<br />

Macedonia, Rep. of 40 (2.1) i<br />

Trinidad <strong>and</strong> Tobago 40 (2.1) i<br />

Iran, Islamic Rep. of 39 (2.1) i<br />

Indonesia 25 (1.8) i<br />

Kuwait 16 (1.7) i<br />

Qatar 15 (1.0) i<br />

Morocco 15 (1.8) i<br />

South Africa 12 (1.0) i<br />

Percentage of students receiving full credit significantly<br />

higher than international average h<br />

Percentage of students receiving full credit significantly<br />

lower than international average I<br />

2b National Defined Population covers less than 80% of National Desired Population<br />

(see Exhibit A.4).<br />

( ) St<strong>and</strong>ard errors appear in parentheses. Because results are rounded to the nearest<br />

whole number, some totals may appear inconsistent.<br />

NOTE: The International Average does not include the results from the Canadian provinces.<br />

SOURCE: IEA Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (<strong>PIRLS</strong>) 2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!