10.03.2014 Views

GGCA Gender and Climate Change Training Manual - Women's ...

GGCA Gender and Climate Change Training Manual - Women's ...

GGCA Gender and Climate Change Training Manual - Women's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

steadfastly to the gender myths about women, their role <strong>and</strong> participation in the<br />

economy (Box 7). Therefore, it is not surprising that these issues should continue<br />

to dominate within climate change finance at all levels. It is not uncommon that<br />

the private sector does not pay attention to gender issues at all. Thus the market<br />

tends to ignore the impacts of its actions on women’s l<strong>and</strong>-use options, incomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> livelihoods, food affordability <strong>and</strong> the related cost of living including the<br />

price of l<strong>and</strong>. This, unfortunately, is also true of World Bank-implemented projects,<br />

despite the tremendous amount of research that the Bank has undertaken on<br />

gender <strong>and</strong> development.<br />

Invariably, it is the case that climate change financing occurs in a<br />

context in which, even when it does consider women, they are still seen as<br />

vulnerable groups instead of major environmental <strong>and</strong> agricultural producers<br />

in the world. Unfortunately, the myths of the male farmers, the male business<br />

owner <strong>and</strong> the male head of household continue to dominate the imagination<br />

of climate change financing decision makers.<br />

So, for example, in the case of financing mechanisms such as REDD, it is<br />

important to undertake gender <strong>and</strong> social impact assessment in order to make<br />

sure that women do not lose their ownership <strong>and</strong> control of l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> forests.<br />

A key goal built into such projects must be that they, at worse, do no harm by<br />

displacing <strong>and</strong> dispossessing women <strong>and</strong> indigenous people from their traditional<br />

patterns of access <strong>and</strong> control of these resources. At best, such projects should<br />

aim to enhance women’s <strong>and</strong> men’s economic <strong>and</strong> social status.<br />

219<br />

In the case of the carbon markets, the inherent assumption is a level<br />

playing field in which women <strong>and</strong> men have the same carbon footprints. So the<br />

issue of equity of burden sharing does not arise. But equity of burden sharing<br />

is quite a weighty issue as it is well known that women <strong>and</strong> indigenous people<br />

have smaller ecological footprints. Instruments must be devised that take this into<br />

account. This could include, for example, governmental incentives such as tax<br />

breaks, grants <strong>and</strong> outright set-aside programmes for women <strong>and</strong> for indigenous<br />

groups. Within the context of the market, the pooling of funds to create womencentred<br />

funding instruments would be a step in the right direction. However,<br />

such innovations will only arise from greater awareness of, <strong>and</strong> education <strong>and</strong><br />

training on, the dynamics of the carbon markets, its functioning <strong>and</strong> impacts as<br />

well as its opportunities <strong>and</strong> constraints.<br />

Module 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!