Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Table 11.13. Annual percent of project effectiveness of California Department of Fish and
Wildlife’s Fisheries Restoration Grant Program in Northern California (Collins 2005;
CDFG 2006-2012, CDFW 2013). ....................................................................................... 284
Table 12.1. Criteria for assessing extinction risk for SONCC coho salmon populations. For a
given population, the highest risk score for any category determines the population’s overall
extinction risk (Williams et al. 2008). ................................................................................ 304
Table 12.2. SONCC coho salmon ESU independent populations and their risk of extinction... 312
Table 12.3. Estimated naturally spawning coho salmon abundance for populations in the action
area. ..................................................................................................................................... 326
Table 12.4. List of projects or activities that currently have permitted or exempted take of coho
salmon in the action area..................................................................................................... 335
Table 12.5. A summary of the coho salmon life stage exposure period to project-related flow
effects. ................................................................................................................................. 337
Table 12.6. Summary of risks resulting from the proposed action to coho salmon life stages. . 356
Table 12.7. Dewatering and fish relocation associated with CDFW’s Fisheries Restoration Grant
Program. .............................................................................................................................. 360
Table 12.8. Summary of the proposed action’s adverse effects and minimization measures. ... 372
Table 13.1 Summary of maximum annual levels of incidental take of LRS and SNS anticipated
to occur as a result of the proposed action. ......................................................................... 380
Table 13.2 Estimated annual maximum entrainment take of LRS and SNS at Project facilities as
a result of implementing the proposed action. .................................................................... 384
Table 13.3 Summary of anticipated maximum annual amount of incidental take of LRS and SNS
occurring as a result of the proposed action. ....................................................................... 387
Table 13.4 Minimum daily average flows (cfs) for Iron Gate Dam. .......................................... 389
Table 13.5 Expected annual Environmental Water Account volume relative to the Upper
Klamath Lake Supply. ........................................................................................................ 390
Table 13.6 Summary of annual incidental take of SONCC coho salmon expected to occur as a
result of the proposed action. .............................................................................................. 392
Table 13.7. Summary of LRS and SNS Terms and Conditions monitoring plan development and
implementation schedule, and annual monitoring report due date. .................................... 402
Table 13.8 Schedule Summary for LRS and SNS Term and Conditions, Mandatory Monitoring,
and Reporting Requirements............................................................................................... 403
Table 13.9 Summary of reporting and other communication requirements necessary to
implement Terms and Conditions, and meet reporting requirements associated with
Incidental Take and Term and Condition Monitoring. ....................................................... 406
Table 13.10 Summary of meetings required to implement Term and Conditions, monitor
incidental take, and meet associated reporting requirements. ............................................. 408
ix