22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.6 Integration and Synthesis<br />

The integration and synthesis is the final step <strong>of</strong> the NMFS’ assessment <strong>of</strong> the risk posed to<br />

species as a result <strong>of</strong> implementing the proposed action. In this section, NMFS adds the effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> the action to the environmental baseline and the cumulative effects to formulate NMFS’<br />

biological opinion on whether the proposed action is likely to result in appreciable reductions in<br />

the likelihood <strong>of</strong> both survival and recovery <strong>of</strong> the species in the wild by reducing its numbers,<br />

reproduction, or distribution. This assessment is made in full consideration <strong>of</strong> the status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species.<br />

In the Status <strong>of</strong> the Species section, NMFS summarized the currently high extinction risk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

SONCC coho salmon ESU. The factors that led to the listing <strong>of</strong> SONCC coho salmon ESU as a<br />

threatened species and the currently high extinction risk include past and ongoing human<br />

activities, climatological trends and ocean conditions. Beyond the continuation <strong>of</strong> the human<br />

activities affecting the species, NMFS also expects that ocean conditions and climatic shifts will<br />

continue to have both positive and negative effects on the species’ ability to survive and recover.<br />

The extinction risk criteria established for the SONCC coho salmon ESU are intended to<br />

represent a species, including its constituent populations, that is able to respond to environmental<br />

changes and withstand adverse environmental conditions. Thus, when NMFS determines that a<br />

species or population has a high or moderate risk <strong>of</strong> extinction, NMFS also understands that<br />

future environmental changes could have significant consequences on the species’ ability to<br />

become conserved. Also, concluding that a species has a moderate or high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction<br />

does not mean that the species has little or no potential to become viable, but that the species<br />

faces moderate to high risks from internal and external processes that can drive a species to<br />

extinction. With this understanding <strong>of</strong> the current risk <strong>of</strong> extinction <strong>of</strong> the SONCC coho salmon<br />

ESU, NMFS will analyze whether the added effects <strong>of</strong> the proposed action are likely to increase<br />

the species’ extinction risk, while integrating the effects <strong>of</strong> the environmental baseline, other<br />

activities that are interdependent or interrelated with the proposed action, and cumulative effects.<br />

All four VSP parameters for the SONCC coho salmon ESU are indicative <strong>of</strong> a species facing<br />

moderate to high risks <strong>of</strong> extinction from myriad threats. As noted previously, in order for the<br />

SONCC coho salmon ESU to be viable, all seven diversity strata that comprise the species must<br />

be viable and meet certain criteria for population representation, abundance, and diversity.<br />

Current information indicates that the species is presently vulnerable to further impacts to its<br />

abundance and productivity (Good et al. 2005, Ly and Ruddy 2011).<br />

Known or estimated abundance <strong>of</strong> the SONCC coho salmon populations indicates most<br />

populations have relatively low abundance and are at high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction. Species diversity<br />

has declined and is influenced, in part, by the large proportion <strong>of</strong> hatchery fish that comprise the<br />

ESU. Population growth rates appear to be declining in many areas and distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

species has declined. Population growth rates, abundance, diversity, and distribution have been<br />

affected by both anthropogenic activities and environmental variation in the climate and ocean<br />

conditions. The species’ reliance on productive ocean environments, wetter climatological<br />

conditions and a diversity <strong>of</strong> riverine habitats to bolster or buffer populations against adverse<br />

367

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!