22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Although entrainment <strong>of</strong> LRS and SNS is likely to occur at other Project diversions under the<br />

proposed action, the only facility where entrainment has been measured is at Gerber Dam, where<br />

<strong>Reclamation</strong> estimates that 250 juvenile SNS could be entrained annually (USBR 2012).<br />

Although no entrainment estimates are available for Clear Lake Dam, we assume entrainment <strong>of</strong><br />

larval suckers is occurring there because the dam is downstream <strong>of</strong> the Willow Creek mouth<br />

where larval suckers enter the lake. However, suckers larger than approximately 35 mm total<br />

length are not likely entrained because <strong>of</strong> the small size <strong>of</strong> the openings in the fish screen.<br />

Entrainment rates at these facilities are likely much lower than at the Link River Dam because<br />

there are fewer reproducing adults present in these areas when compared to UKL. Therefore at<br />

these other facilities, we assumed that entrainment take would be 10 percent <strong>of</strong> that which is<br />

estimated to be occurring at the Link River Dam where entrainment was measured. The basis for<br />

that assumption is the following: (1) the combined total adult sucker populations in Clear Lake,<br />

Gerber Reservoir, Tule Lake, Keno Reservoir, and Lost River is approximately half <strong>of</strong> those in<br />

UKL; (2) larvae would be present earlier in the season and for a shorter period in Gerber<br />

Reservoir and Clear Lake in comparison to UKL because <strong>of</strong> the earlier run-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> snow-melt in<br />

the Lost River sub-basin; (3) flows from Clear Lake and Gerber Reservoir Dams are much less<br />

than at the Link River Dam when larvae are present because <strong>of</strong> the small demand for irrigation<br />

on the east side <strong>of</strong> the Project at that time; (4) flows at the Link River Dam in the spring are high<br />

due to the downstream needs <strong>of</strong> coho salmon; and (5) water quality is better in Clear Lake and<br />

Gerber Reservoir in comparison to UKL, so there would be less <strong>of</strong> an effect <strong>of</strong> water quality on<br />

entrainment rates at Clear Lake and Gerber Reservoir, as explained in the Effects <strong>of</strong> the Action<br />

(section 8).<br />

Based on this, we estimate that total annual entrainment take as harm as a result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the proposed action by all Project water-management facilities other than at<br />

the A Canal and Link River Dam equals up to 2,700 larvae, 60 juveniles, and 10 adults. The<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> LRS and SNS annually harassed by these facilities is estimated to be up to 134,000<br />

larvae, 3,000 juveniles, and 10 adults (Table 13.2). Note that we estimated that the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />

adults harassed and harmed per year would be up to 10, which is the smallest number that likely<br />

could be detected.<br />

13.2.1.5 Entrainment Estimates for the Entire Project<br />

Based on the analysis presented above, we estimate that the total annual entrainment take <strong>of</strong> LRS<br />

and SNS at all Project diversions, as a result <strong>of</strong> implementing the proposed action, could be up to<br />

350,672 harmed and 1.88 million harassed; most <strong>of</strong> these will be larvae (Table 13.2).<br />

383

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!