22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

population size can lead to extinction <strong>of</strong> a small population even if the population is growing, on<br />

average, over a longer period.<br />

Many SONCC coho salmon ESU populations have declined to such a low point that they are<br />

likely influenced by multiple, interacting processes (e.g., Shasta River, Middle Mainstem Eel<br />

River, Mainstem Eel River, Upper Mainstem Eel River, and Mattole River populations), that<br />

make recovery <strong>of</strong> the SONCC coho salmon ESU difficult. These random processes can create<br />

alterations in genetics, breeding structure, and population dynamics that may interfere with<br />

persistence <strong>of</strong> the species. Random processes can be expressed in four ways: genetic,<br />

demographic, environmental, and catastrophic events (Shaffer 1981, Lande 1993, McElhany et<br />

al. 2000, Reed et al. 2007).<br />

Genetic stochasticity refers to changes in the genetic composition <strong>of</strong> a population unrelated to<br />

systematic forces (selection, inbreeding, or migration), i.e., genetic drift. Genetic stochasticity<br />

can have a large impact on the genetic structure <strong>of</strong> populations, both by reducing the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

diversity retained within populations and by increasing the chance that deleterious recessive<br />

alleles may be expressed. The loss <strong>of</strong> diversity will likely limit a population's ability to respond<br />

adaptively to future environmental changes. In addition, the increased frequency with which<br />

deleterious recessive alleles are expressed (because <strong>of</strong> increased homozygosity) could reduce the<br />

viability and reproductive capacity <strong>of</strong> individuals.<br />

Demographic stochasticity refers to the variability in population growth rates arising from<br />

random differences among individuals in survival and reproduction within a season. This<br />

variability will occur even if all individuals have the same expected ability to survive and<br />

reproduce and if the expected rates <strong>of</strong> survival and reproduction don't change from one<br />

generation to the next. Even though it will occur in all populations, demographic stochasticity is<br />

generally important only in populations that are already small (Lande 1993, McElhany et al.<br />

2000). In very small populations, demographic stochasticity can lead to extinction<br />

(Shulenburger et al. 1999).<br />

Environmental stochasticity is the type <strong>of</strong> variability in population growth rates that refers to<br />

variation in birth and death rates from one season to the next in response to weather, disease,<br />

competition, predation, or other factors external to the population (Melbourne and Hastings<br />

2008). Catastrophic events are sudden, rare occurrences that severely reduce or eliminate an<br />

entire population in a relatively short period <strong>of</strong> time (McElhany et al. 2000). For example, the<br />

1964 flood in northern California significantly degraded many watersheds and reduced the<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> many SONCC coho salmon ESU populations.<br />

These stochastic processes always occur; however, they don’t always significantly influence<br />

population dynamics until populations are small. Due to the low abundance <strong>of</strong> most SONCC<br />

coho salmon ESU populations, stochastic pressure is likely to be one <strong>of</strong> the most significant<br />

threats to their persistence. Stochastic events have likely contributed to population instability<br />

and decline for many SONCC coho salmon ESU populations, which likely explain why recent<br />

adult returns remain low despite improved ocean conditions since 2007 and significant<br />

reductions in bycatch mortality from commercial and recreational fishery closures enacted more<br />

than 15 years ago.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!