22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Stratum<br />

Independent Extinction<br />

Population Viability Metric<br />

Populations<br />

Risk<br />

(Williams et al. 2008)<br />

Bear River<br />

High<br />

Mattole River<br />

High<br />

Population below depensation threshold 1<br />

Interior Eel Mainstem Eel River High<br />

Middle Mainstem Eel<br />

Population likely below depensation threshold 1<br />

High<br />

River<br />

Upper Mainstem Eel<br />

River<br />

High<br />

Population below depensation threshold 1<br />

Middle Fork Eel River High<br />

South Fork Eel River Moderate Population likely above depensation threshold 1<br />

1 Based on average spawner abundance over the past three years or best pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment <strong>of</strong> NMFS staff.<br />

Based on the above discussion <strong>of</strong> the population viability parameters, and qualitative viability<br />

criteria presented in Williams et al. (2008), NMFS concludes that the SONCC coho salmon ESU<br />

is currently not viable and is at a high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction.<br />

The precipitous decline in abundance from historical levels and the poor status <strong>of</strong> population<br />

viability metrics in general are the main factors behind the extinction risk faced by SONCC coho<br />

salmon. NMFS believes the main cause <strong>of</strong> the recent decline is likely poor ocean conditions and<br />

the widespread degradation <strong>of</strong> habitat, particularly those habitat attributes that support the<br />

freshwater rearing life-stages <strong>of</strong> the species.<br />

12.2.6 Factors Responsible for the Current Status <strong>of</strong> SONCC Coho Salmon ESU<br />

When the SONCC ESU was listed, the major factors identified as responsible for the decline <strong>of</strong><br />

coho salmon in Oregon and California and/or degradation <strong>of</strong> their habitat included logging, road<br />

building, grazing, mining, urbanization, stream channelization, dams, wetland loss, beaver<br />

trapping, artificial propagation, over-fishing, water withdrawals, and unscreened diversions for<br />

irrigation (62 FR 24588; May 6, 1997). The lack, or inadequacy, <strong>of</strong> protective measures in<br />

existing regulatory mechanisms, including land management plans (e.g., State Forest Practice<br />

Rules), Clean Water Act section 404 regulatory activities, urban growth management, and<br />

harvest and hatchery management, contributed by varying degrees to the decline <strong>of</strong> coho salmon.<br />

Below, some <strong>of</strong> these major activities are covered in more detail.<br />

In addition to the factors responsible for the current status <strong>of</strong> the SONCC coho salmon ESU<br />

critical habitat, ocean conditions, reduction in marine derived nutrients, artificial propagation,<br />

commercial fisheries and small population size also affect the current status <strong>of</strong> SONCC coho<br />

salmon ESU.<br />

12.2.6.1 Ocean Conditions<br />

Variability in ocean productivity has been shown to affect fisheries production both positively<br />

and negatively (Chavez et al. 2003). Beamish and Bouillion (1993) showed a strong correlation<br />

between North Pacific salmon production and marine environmental factors from 1925 to 1989.<br />

Coho salmon marine survival corresponds with periods <strong>of</strong> alternating cold and warm ocean<br />

conditions. Cold conditions are generally good for coho salmon, while warm conditions are not<br />

(Peterson et al. 2010). Unusually warm ocean surface temperatures and associated changes in<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!