22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

fisheries south <strong>of</strong> Cape Falcon, Oregon. Preliminary post-season estimates <strong>of</strong> ocean exploitation<br />

rate for 2010 and 2011 are 2.2 and 3.8 percent, respectively (PFMC 2011, 2012). Because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

generally limited Chinook salmon fishery since 2005, NMFS believes the commercial fishery<br />

has been a small threat to the SONCC coho salmon ESU.<br />

Figure 12.12. Rogue/Klamath (R/K) coho salmon ocean exploitation rate forecast for years 2000-2010 (PFMC<br />

2010).<br />

12.2.6.5 Small Population Size<br />

SONCC coho salmon populations have declined significantly (e.g., Shasta River population) and<br />

are facing an additional threat from the effects <strong>of</strong> small population size. Many populations, such<br />

as the Shasta River population, are at a high risk <strong>of</strong> extinction because <strong>of</strong> their small population<br />

size (e.g., only 44, 62, and 115 spawners returned to the Shasta River in the 2010, 2011 and 2012<br />

spawning seasons, respectively). With a majority <strong>of</strong> SONCC coho salmon populations at low<br />

abundance, random events become an increased and significant factor in the extinction process.<br />

Small populations have a significantly increased risk <strong>of</strong> extinction (Shaffer 1981, McElhany et<br />

al. 2000, Fagan and Holmes 2006). In fact, time-to-extinction decreases logarithmically with<br />

decreasing population size (Lande 1993, Fagan and Holmes 2006). Population declines are<br />

likely to cause further declines, especially for small populations because stochastic factors exert<br />

more influence (Fagan and Holmes 2006). Small populations can be affected by different forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> stochastic pressure, not all <strong>of</strong> which affect large populations (Lande 1993). The fact that small<br />

populations can be affected by different forms <strong>of</strong> stochastic pressure results in extinction<br />

probabilities substantially greater than the extinction probabilities that would occur from a single<br />

form <strong>of</strong> stochasticity (Melbourne and Hastings 2008).<br />

Small populations are likely largely influenced by random processes that affect population<br />

dynamics and population persistence. If the rate <strong>of</strong> population growth varies from one<br />

generation to the next, a series <strong>of</strong> generations in which there are successive declines in<br />

318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!