22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

similar to Chinook salmon infection rates since coho salmon have similar susceptibility to C.<br />

shasta as Chinook salmon (Stone et al. 2008). In 2008, 46 percent <strong>of</strong> the Chinook salmon<br />

sampled from the mainstem Klamath River between the Shasta River and Scott River in May and<br />

June were infected and up to 37 percent showed clinical infections (e.g., inflammatory tissue in<br />

>33% <strong>of</strong> the intestine section; Nichols et al. 2009).<br />

As previously discussed in the Hydrologic Effects section (i.e., section 11.4.1.1), the proposed<br />

action generally reduces spring flows in the mainstem Klamath River downstream <strong>of</strong> IGD. By<br />

reducing spring flows, the proposed action will result in drier hydrologic conditions in the<br />

mainstem Klamath River relative to the natural hydrologic regime. Summer base flow<br />

conditions occur earlier than historically, with spring flows now receding precipitously in May<br />

and June, whereas the spring snow-melt pulse and the vast amount <strong>of</strong> upper Klamath Basin<br />

wetland historically attenuated flows in the Klamath River much more slowly into August or<br />

September. Therefore, when environmental conditions are conducive to actinospore release in<br />

the spring (e.g., elevated water temperature), the proposed action will likely result in hydrologic<br />

conditions in the mainstem Klamath River that contribute to high C. shasta actinospore<br />

concentrations (e.g., ≥5 spores/L actinospore genotype II), which will likely increase the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> disease-related mortality to coho salmon fry in the mainstem Klamath River<br />

between Trees <strong>of</strong> Heaven (RM 172) and Seiad Valley (RM 129) in May to mid-June (Foot et al.<br />

2008, Hallett et al. 2012, Ray et al. 2012). The proposed action will also likely increase the<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> coho salmon fry in the mainstem Klamath River between Klamathon Bridge (RM<br />

184) and Orleans (RM 59) that will experience sublethal effects <strong>of</strong> C. shasta infections during<br />

April to mid-June. Sublethal effects include impaired growth, swimming performance, body<br />

condition, and increased stress and susceptibility to secondary infections (Hallett et al. 2012).<br />

NMFS notes that <strong>Reclamation</strong> added a near real-time disease management element to the<br />

proposed action for deviating from the formulaic approach and increasing spring flows when<br />

near-real-time monitoring shows that disease thresholds have been met and EWA surplus volume<br />

is available. Flow increases in the spring to avert potential risks <strong>of</strong> disease will occur through<br />

close coordination between the Services and <strong>Reclamation</strong> with consideration to potential effects<br />

to listed suckers. While NMFS cannot specifically predict the full range <strong>of</strong> hydrologic<br />

conditions when flow increases above the formulaic approach will occur, surplus EWA volume<br />

will likely be available in wet to below average hydrological water years. Because actinospore<br />

densities are likely low during above average and wet years, the proposed increase in spring<br />

flows will help dilute actinospore densities in the mainstem Klamath River below IGD during<br />

average and below average water years. Therefore, the real-time disease management element <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposed action may minimize disease risks to coho salmon during average and below<br />

average water years. Note that when EWA surplus volume is used to increase spring flows,<br />

summer flows in the mainstem will be lower than modeled, depending on the amount <strong>of</strong> EWA<br />

surplus volume used for adaptively minimizing disease risks. However, minimum daily flows in<br />

the summer will not be affected by the near real-time disease management.<br />

During dry water years, the proposed daily minimum flows for April, May and June will provide<br />

at least 1325 cfs, 1175 cfs, and 1025 cfs, respectively, at IGD for diluting actinospores. While<br />

these proposed minimum daily flows are not likely sufficient to dilute actinospore concentrations<br />

to below 5 genotype II spores/L when actinospore concentrations are high, these minimum daily<br />

343

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!