22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.2.6.2 Marine Derived Nutrients<br />

Marine-derived nutrients are nutrients that are accumulated in the biomass <strong>of</strong> salmonids while<br />

they are in the ocean and are then transferred to their freshwater spawning sites where the salmon<br />

die. The return <strong>of</strong> salmonids to rivers makes a significant contribution to the flora and fauna <strong>of</strong><br />

both terrestrial and riverine ecosystems (Gresh et al. 2000), and has been shown to be vital for<br />

the growth <strong>of</strong> juvenile salmonids (Bilby et al. 1996, 1998, Giannico and Hinch 2007, Wipfli et<br />

al. 2003, 2004, 2010). Evidence <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> marine-derived nutrients and energy in<br />

ecosystems suggests this deficit is likely to result in an ecosystem failure contributing to the<br />

downward spiral <strong>of</strong> salmonid abundance (Bilby et al. 1996). Reduction <strong>of</strong> marine-derived<br />

nutrients to watersheds is a consequence <strong>of</strong> the past century <strong>of</strong> decline in salmon abundance<br />

(Gresh et al. 2000).<br />

12.2.6.3 Artificial Propagation<br />

Three artificial propagation programs are considered to be part <strong>of</strong> the ESU: the Cole Rivers<br />

Hatchery (Rogue River), Trinity River Hatchery, and Iron Gate Hatchery (IGH, Klamath River)<br />

coho programs. These hatcheries produce not only coho salmon but also Chinook salmon and<br />

steelhead for release into the wild. Iron Gate (IGH), Trinity River, and Cole Rivers hatcheries<br />

release roughly 14,215,000 hatchery salmonids into SONCC coho salmon ESU rivers annually.<br />

Annual coho salmon production goals at these hatcheries are 75,000, 500,000, and 200,000,<br />

respectively. In addition to the three hatcheries, the Mad River and Rowdy Creek hatcheries in<br />

California and the Elk River Hatchery in Oregon produce steelhead and Chinook salmon that can<br />

prey on or compete with wild SONCC ESU coho salmon.<br />

Natural populations in these basins are heavily influenced by hatcheries (Weitkamp et al. 1995;<br />

Good et al. 2005) through genetic and ecological interactions. Genetic risks associated with out<strong>of</strong>-basin<br />

and out-<strong>of</strong>-ESU stock transfers have largely been eliminated. However, two significant<br />

genetic concerns remain: 1) the potential for domestication selection in hatchery populations<br />

such as the Trinity River, where there is little or no infusion <strong>of</strong> wild genes, and 2) straying by<br />

large numbers <strong>of</strong> hatchery coho salmon either in basin or out-<strong>of</strong>-basin. Spawning by hatchery<br />

salmonids in rivers and streams is <strong>of</strong>ten not controlled (Independent Scientific Advisory Board<br />

2002) and hatchery fish stray into rivers and streams, transferring genes from hatchery<br />

populations into naturally spawning populations (Pearse et al. 2007). CDFG (2002b) found that<br />

29 percent <strong>of</strong> coho salmon carcasses recovered at the Shasta River fish counting facility had left<br />

maxillary clips in 2001, indicating that they were progeny from the IGH. The average<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> hatchery coho salmon carcasses recovered at the Shasta River fish counting facility<br />

from 2001, 2003, and 2004 was 16 percent (Ackerman and Cramer 2006). Although the actual<br />

percentages <strong>of</strong> hatchery fish in the river change from year to year and depend largely on natural<br />

returns, these data indicate that straying <strong>of</strong> IGH fish do occur in important tributaries <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Klamath River.<br />

The transferring <strong>of</strong> genes from hatchery fish can be problematic because hatchery programs have<br />

the potential to significantly alter the genetic composition (Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999, Ford<br />

2002), phenotypic traits (Hard et al. 2000; Kostow 2004), and behavior (Berejikian et al. 1996)<br />

<strong>of</strong> reared fish. Genetic interactions between hatchery and naturally produced stocks can decrease<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!