22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>of</strong> coho salmon fry in the mainstem Klamath River between IGD and Salmon River (RM 66)<br />

from late March to mid-June when IGH salmonids are also in the mainstem.<br />

Conversely, when conditions are favorable (e.g., good water quality, low juvenile abundance,<br />

low disease), the proposed action is likely to have minimal adverse effects to coho salmon fry.<br />

By mid-June, coho salmon fry are likely to have transformed from fry to parr, and coho fry<br />

abundance in the mainstem Klamath River in late June is likely at a level that habitat reductions<br />

resulting from the proposed action are minimal.<br />

Given the abundance <strong>of</strong> coho salmon fry and juveniles is likely to be greatest in the mainstem<br />

Klamath River from April through June, <strong>Reclamation</strong> has proposed a precautionary approach to<br />

managing flows during the driest <strong>of</strong> conditions and has proposed to implement Hardy et al.’s<br />

(2006) recommended ecological base flows as minimums during the April through June period.<br />

During dry hydrologic conditions in the Klamath Basin, the proposed action will minimize<br />

adverse effects to coho salmon fry in April to June by not reducing flows in the mainstem<br />

Klamath River below what Hardy et al. (2006) considers to be acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> risk to the<br />

health <strong>of</strong> aquatic resources. Note that Hardy et al. (2006) did not quantitatively assess disease<br />

risks in the ecological base flow recommendation.<br />

12.4.1.2.3.3 Disease<br />

Ceratomyxosis, which is caused by the C. shasta parasite, is the focus for NMFS in the coho<br />

salmon disease analysis because researchers believe that this parasite is a key factor limiting<br />

salmon recovery in the Klamath River (Foott et al. 2009). Coho salmon in the Klamath River<br />

have coevolved with C. shasta and are relatively resistant to infection from this parasite (Hallett<br />

et al. 2012, Ray et al 2012). However, the high mortality <strong>of</strong> Klamath River salmonids from C.<br />

shasta is atypical (Hallett et al. 2012). Modifications to water flow, sedimentation, and<br />

temperature have likely upset the host-parasite balance in the Klamath River (Hallett et al. 2012).<br />

NMFS believes the high incidence <strong>of</strong> disease in certain years within the mainstem Klamath River<br />

results largely from the reduction in magnitude, frequency, and duration <strong>of</strong> mainstem flows from<br />

the natural flow regime under which coho salmon evolved. The proposed action’s effects on<br />

spring flows and channel maintenance flows and their relationship to disease are discussed<br />

below. Research on the effects <strong>of</strong> C. shasta on coho salmon juveniles is applicable to coho<br />

salmon fry because the parasite targets species not life stages (Hallett et al. 2012).<br />

12.4.1.2.3.3.1 Spring Flows<br />

The likelihood <strong>of</strong> coho salmon fry to succumb to ceratomyxosis is a function <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />

variables, such as temperature, flow, and density <strong>of</strong> actinospores (True et al. 2013). Ray et al.<br />

(2012) found that actinospore density, and then temperature, was the hierarchy <strong>of</strong> relative<br />

importance in affecting ceratomyxosis for juvenile salmonids in the Klamath River. When<br />

actinospore densities are high, thermal influences on disease dampen (Ray et al. 2012). Recent<br />

studies are further supporting the observation <strong>of</strong> a threshold for high infectivity and mortality <strong>of</strong><br />

juvenile salmonids when the Klamath River actinospore density exceeds about 10 actinospores/L<br />

(Hallett and Bartholomew 2006, Ray et al. 2012). For coho salmon juveniles, actinospore<br />

341

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!