22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

characteristics <strong>of</strong> aquatic species, such as coho salmon, the large size and variability <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Klamath River, and the operational complexities <strong>of</strong> managing Klamath River flows, quantifying<br />

individuals that may be taken incidental to the many components <strong>of</strong> the proposed action is<br />

generally not possible. In addition, incidental take <strong>of</strong> coho salmon from the increased disease<br />

risk is difficult to estimate because <strong>of</strong> the limited data on coho salmon-specific infection and<br />

mortality rates. When NMFS cannot quantify the level <strong>of</strong> incidental take, NMFS uses surrogates<br />

to estimate the amount or extent <strong>of</strong> incidental take.<br />

For estimating incidental take from habitat reductions, elevated water temperatures, reductions to<br />

dissolved oxygen concentrations, decreased smolt outmigration rates, and increased disease<br />

risks, NMFS uses a hydrologic-based surrogate because water availability in the mainstem<br />

Klamath River in the spring and summer has a direct effect on these sources <strong>of</strong> incidental take.<br />

NMFS made a number <strong>of</strong> assumptions regarding water availability under the Proposed Action<br />

that are within and outside the discretion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s actions. As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s<br />

model output from the Proposed Action’s formulaic approach, NMFS made assumptions<br />

regarding the shape <strong>of</strong> the annual hydrographs and then analyzed the effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s<br />

proposed action on coho salmon based on these assumptions. Included in those assumptions<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s discretion is the assumption that accretion timing, magnitude and<br />

volume from Keno Dam to IGD in the proposed action period will be consistent with the<br />

accretion timing, magnitude and volume modeled for the 1981-2011 period.<br />

As discussed in the BiOp, NMFS identified that the proposed action will result in the incidental<br />

take <strong>of</strong> coho salmon in the mainstem Klamath River due to habitat reductions during March<br />

through June, elevated water temperatures during May to June, reductions to dissolved oxygen<br />

concentrations during June to August, decreased smolt outmigration during April to June, and<br />

increased disease risks during April to August. Since habitat reductions, elevated water<br />

temperatures, reductions to dissolved oxygen concentrations, decreased smolt outmigration rates,<br />

and increased disease risks are inextricably linked to flow, NMFS uses the minimum average<br />

daily flows at IGD during March to August (Table 13.4) and the calculated EWA volumes<br />

relative to the UKL Supply (Table 13.5) to measure the level <strong>of</strong> incidental take because the<br />

minimum average daily IGD flows and the annual EWA volumes are within <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s<br />

discretion.<br />

NMFS cannot predict a specific proportion <strong>of</strong> the EWA distribution that will be incrementally<br />

released during the March through August period, when NMFS anticipates incidental take <strong>of</strong><br />

coho salmon juveniles will occur, for a number <strong>of</strong> reasons. Distribution <strong>of</strong> the EWA during the<br />

period March through September is dependent upon Williamson River flow as a hydrological<br />

indicator to determine the releases from UKL at Link River Dam. In addition, releases at Link<br />

River Dam during March through September also take into account accretions between Link<br />

River Dam and IGD, UKL fill rate, water released for flood prevention, the volume <strong>of</strong> EWA that<br />

needs to be reserved for the base flow period (June through September), and the volume <strong>of</strong> EWA<br />

already used. During the July through September period, EWA releases may be reduced if IGD<br />

maximum flow targets are anticipated to be exceeded, which results in surplus EWA stored for<br />

release in October and November. This approach produces a hydrograph that reflects real-time<br />

hydrologic conditions, while also requiring specific portions <strong>of</strong> the total EWA to be reserved for<br />

use by specific dates. Nevertheless, NMFS expects the total EWA volume relative to the UKL<br />

388

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!