22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.4 Effects to Individuals<br />

The proposed action affects SONCC coho salmon through the Project Operations and the annual<br />

restoration funding <strong>of</strong> approximately $500,000. Project Operations affect coho salmon through<br />

hydrologic and habitat modifications in the mainstem Klamath River, while the annual<br />

restoration funding affects coho salmon during restoration implementation and through habitat<br />

improvements. Note that the use <strong>of</strong> the term “proposed action” in the Project Operations section<br />

represents Klamath Project operations component <strong>of</strong> the proposed action, while the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

term “proposed action” in the Restoration Activities section represents the habitat restoration<br />

component <strong>of</strong> the proposed action.<br />

12.4.1 Project Operations<br />

As stated in the Effects to SONCC Coho Salmon ESU Critical Habitat section, the coho salmon<br />

effects analysis is based on the results <strong>of</strong> the formulaic approach described in the proposed action<br />

and on one element <strong>of</strong> the proposed adaptive management where details are sufficient for<br />

analysis. Besides the proposed near real-time management for minimizing disease risks, the<br />

coho salmon effects analysis does not include the proposed adaptive management because<br />

NMFS does not have sufficient information on the adaptive management approach at this time.<br />

Under the proposed action, the median Project delivery from all sources by water year is 428,200<br />

acre-ft with a minimum <strong>of</strong> 178,000 acre-ft and a maximum <strong>of</strong> 477,000 acre-ft (<strong>Reclamation</strong><br />

2012). Approximately 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the Project water delivery is not returned to the mainstem<br />

Klamath River (Cameron 2013). Therefore, approximately 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the Project water is<br />

returned to the Klamath River as agricultural tailwater, which contributes to impaired water<br />

quality in the Klamath River. The proposed action’s effects to coho salmon result from the<br />

reduction to flows at IGD.<br />

12.4.1.1 Exposure<br />

As previously discussed in the Hydrologic Effects section (i.e., section 11.4.1.1), the proposed<br />

action reduces flows in the mainstem Klamath River throughout most <strong>of</strong> the year. Therefore, all<br />

life stages <strong>of</strong> coho salmon are expected to be exposed to proposed action effects in the next ten<br />

years (Table 12.5). However, different populations <strong>of</strong> coho salmon will be exposed to varying<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> flow effects under the proposed action. Populations proximal to IGD will experience<br />

the most pronounced exposure, while populations farthest away, such as the Lower Klamath<br />

River population, are not likely to be exposed.<br />

Adult coho salmon are present in the mainstem Klamath River only during the upstream<br />

migration and spawning period. Upstream migration <strong>of</strong> adult coho salmon in the Klamath River<br />

spans the period from September to January, with peak movement occurring between late-<br />

October and mid-November. In most years, all adults are observed in tributaries prior to<br />

December 15, while in some years (e.g., Scott River in 2009) most adults are observed between<br />

December 15 and January 1. Therefore, adults that spawn in tributaries are expected to be<br />

exposed primarily in the late fall to early winter.<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!