22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 3.1. The action area for <strong>Reclamation</strong>’s proposed action. ................................................... 8<br />

Figure 3.2. Location <strong>of</strong> the Project in the Upper Klamath River Basin <strong>of</strong> Oregon and California<br />

(<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2013a). .............................................................................................................. 9<br />

Figure 4.1. Modeled EWA and Project Supply, based on UKL supply (<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012). ..... 34<br />

Figure 4.2. Modeled UKL Reserve, EWA, and Project Supply based on available UKL water<br />

supply (<strong>Reclamation</strong> 2012). .................................................................................................. 35<br />

Figure 7.1. The LRS and the SNS currently occur in UKL, reservoirs along the Klamath River,<br />

Clear Lake, Tule Lake, and the Lost River; the SNS is also found in Gerber Reservoir. .... 55<br />

Figure 7.2. Adult spawning populations <strong>of</strong> suckers in UKL have consistently declined since at<br />

least 2001, as estimated by two approaches using mark-recapture models in Program<br />

MARK (from Hewitt et al. 2012). The number <strong>of</strong> spawning female LRS in UKL has<br />

declined by 60 to 80 percent between 2002 and 2010. ......................................................... 58<br />

Figure 7.3 Historic April through November deliveries to Project from UKL. ........................... 63<br />

Figure 7.4 Modeled April through November deliveries to Project from UKL. .......................... 64<br />

Figure 7.5 Model results <strong>of</strong> orthophosphate concentrations from just downstream <strong>of</strong> Klamath<br />

Straits Drain discharge. The “With Klamath Straits Drain/Lost River Diversion Channel”<br />

results are from the 2002 calibration model (ODEQ 2010). ................................................. 75<br />

Figure 7.6 Sprague River trends, water years 1921 through 2012................................................ 85<br />

Figure 7.7 Sprague River trends, water years 1981 through 2012................................................ 86<br />

Figure 7.8 Sprague River trends, water years 1991 through 2012................................................ 87<br />

Figure 7.9 Sprague River trends, water years 2001 through 2012................................................ 88<br />

Figure 7.10 Williamson River trends, water years 1918 through 2012. ....................................... 89<br />

Figure 7.11 Williamson River trends, water years 1981 through 2012. ....................................... 89<br />

Figure 7.12 Williamson River trends, water years 1991 through 2012. ....................................... 90<br />

Figure 7.13 Williamson River trends, water years 2001 through 2012. ....................................... 91<br />

Figure 7.14 UKL trends, water years 1981 through 2012. ........................................................... 92<br />

Figure 7.15 UKL trends, water years 1991 through 2012. ........................................................... 92<br />

Figure 7.16 UKL trends, water years 2001 through 2012. ........................................................... 93<br />

Figure 7.17 UKL: net inflow departure from median. .................................................................. 94<br />

Figure 8.1 UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> October (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ........................... 118<br />

Figure 8.2. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> November (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ..................... 119<br />

Figure 8.3. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> December (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ...................... 120<br />

Figure 8.4. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> January (kaf = thousand acre-feet). .......................... 121<br />

Figure 8.5. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> February (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ........................ 123<br />

Figure 8.6. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> March (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ............................ 124<br />

Figure 8.7. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> April (kaf = thousand acre-feet). .............................. 125<br />

Figure 8.8. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> May (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ............................... 126<br />

Figure 8.9. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> June (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ............................... 127<br />

Figure 8.10. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> July (kaf = thousand acre-feet). .............................. 128<br />

Figure 8.11. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> August (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ......................... 129<br />

Figure 8.12. UKL elevations at the end <strong>of</strong> September (kaf = thousand acre-feet). ................... 130<br />

Figure 8.13. Generalized annual pattern <strong>of</strong> water-level changes in the UKL and Gerber<br />

Reservoir and in Clear Lake over a longer time period as a result <strong>of</strong> the proposed action<br />

compared to what would occur if the proposed action were not implemented. In general,<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!