22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 12.9. Proportion <strong>of</strong> surveyed streams where coho salmon were detected (Good et al. 2005). The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> streams surveyed is shown next to data.<br />

12.2.5.4 Diversity<br />

The primary factors affecting the diversity <strong>of</strong> SONCC ESU coho salmon appear to be low<br />

population abundance and the influence <strong>of</strong> hatcheries and out-<strong>of</strong>-basin introductions. Although<br />

the operation <strong>of</strong> a hatchery tends to increase the abundance <strong>of</strong> returning adults (70 FR 37160;<br />

June 28, 2005), the reproductive success <strong>of</strong> hatchery-born salmonids spawning in the wild can be<br />

significantly less than that <strong>of</strong> naturally produced fish (Araki et al. 2007). As a result, the higher<br />

the proportion <strong>of</strong> hatchery-born spawners, the lower the overall productivity <strong>of</strong> the population, as<br />

demonstrated by Chilcote (2003). Williams et al. (2008) considered a population to be at least at<br />

a moderate risk <strong>of</strong> extinction if the contribution <strong>of</strong> hatchery coho salmon spawning in the wild<br />

exceeds 5 percent. Populations have a lower risk <strong>of</strong> extinction if no or negligible ecological or<br />

genetic effects are demonstrated as a result <strong>of</strong> past or current hatchery operations. Because the<br />

main stocks in the SONCC coho salmon ESU (i.e., Rogue River, Klamath River, and Trinity<br />

River) remain heavily influenced by hatcheries and have little natural production in mainstem<br />

rivers (Weitkamp et al. 1995; Good et al. 2005), many <strong>of</strong> these populations are at high risk <strong>of</strong><br />

extinction relative to the genetic diversity parameter.<br />

In addition, some populations are extirpated or nearly extirpated (i.e., Middle Fork Eel, Bear<br />

River, Upper Mainstem Eel) and some brood years have low abundance or may even be absent<br />

in some areas (e.g., Shasta River, Scott River, Mattole River, Mainstem Eel River), which further<br />

restricts the diversity present in the ESU. The ESU’s current genetic variability and variation in<br />

life history likely contribute significantly to long-term risk <strong>of</strong> extinction. Given the recent trends<br />

in abundance across the ESU, the genetic and life history diversity <strong>of</strong> populations is likely very<br />

low and is inadequate to contribute to a viable ESU.<br />

311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!