22.03.2014 Views

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

Biological Opinions - Bureau of Reclamation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which are more likely to occur <strong>of</strong>fshore than SNS juveniles (Terwilliger 2006, Simon et al 2011,<br />

2012). Habitats used by age-0 juveniles include vegetated and unvegetated areas with apparently<br />

no particular substrate size, including fine substrates such as mud (Buettner and Scoppettone<br />

1990; Simon et al. 2000, 2009; Terwilliger 2006; Hendrixson et al. 2007a, b; Burdick et al.<br />

2009a). However, there is evidence that the juvenile suckers use rocky substrates, such as<br />

gravel, more frequently than fine-grained substrates like mud (Terwilliger 2006; Simon et al.<br />

2009). Access to diverse substrates might increase survival by enabling juvenile suckers to find<br />

more food or avoid predators if environmental conditions affecting the distribution <strong>of</strong> food or<br />

predators change through the summer. Additionally, water quality might vary over different<br />

substrates because <strong>of</strong> the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> currents and the DO demand by organic-rich<br />

sediments, which vary by location in UKL (Wood 2001). In general, rocky substrates in UKL<br />

are found nearshore where sediments are swept away by waves and currents (Eilers and Eilers<br />

2005). Because <strong>of</strong> the increased circulation and lower levels <strong>of</strong> organics in these sediments,<br />

rocky areas should, in general, have higher levels <strong>of</strong> DO than those areas where mud<br />

predominates.<br />

The habitat diversity needs for age-0 juveniles <strong>of</strong> these species are unclear, but when lake levels<br />

drop below about 4,140.0 ft (1,261.9 m) during August, vegetated wetland habitats become<br />

dewatered, and as the lake recedes below 4,138.0 ft (1,261.3 m), rocky substrates become<br />

increasingly scarce as nearshore habitats transition to mud (Simon et al. 1995, Bradbury et al.<br />

2004, Eilers and Eilers 2005). Thus, as lake levels recede below 4,140.0 ft (1,261.9 m) and<br />

especially below 4,139.0 ft (1,261.6 m), age-0 juveniles have fewer available habitats and could<br />

be forced to move into areas where conditions (e.g., food, water quality, or predation) are less<br />

favorable, which could have negative effects on their fitness and survival. At the lowest<br />

modeled elevation at the end <strong>of</strong> August (i.e., 4,138.4 ft [1,261.4 m]), there would be almost no<br />

habitat diversity and age-0 juvenile suckers would have to use muddy substrates.<br />

Although we do not have data showing how habitat diversity affects survival <strong>of</strong> age-0 juveniles,<br />

it is reasonable to assume if habitat becomes limiting it would affect survival. Because LRS age-<br />

0 juveniles tend to use <strong>of</strong>f-shore habitats where mud substrates dominate (Terwilliger 2006;<br />

Simon et al 2010, 2011), they are less likely to be affected by low lake levels. However, because<br />

SNS juveniles are more likely to use inshore areas and a greater diversity <strong>of</strong> substrates<br />

(Terwilliger 2006; Simon et al 2010, 2011), they are more likely to be adversely affected by low<br />

lake levels. Adverse effects are most likely to occur at elevations below 4,139.0 ft (1,261.6 m) in<br />

August. Four <strong>of</strong> the 31 modeled years (13 percent) have elevations at or below 4,139.0 ft<br />

(1,261.6 m) in August (Table 8.1). Under those conditions, SNS age-0 juveniles are likely to<br />

experience low survival.<br />

During September and October, age-0 juveniles appear to leave nearshore areas as the lake<br />

elevation is nearing its annual minimum (Buettner and Scoppettone 1990, Terwilliger 2006). It<br />

is not understood whether this seasonal movement by juveniles is related to decreasing<br />

availability <strong>of</strong> nearshore habitats resulting from declines in lake surface elevations (USFWS<br />

2002), or other causes, such as a biological response to other natural environmental cues or<br />

changes in physiological demands during late summer (USBR 2007). In general, seasonal fish<br />

migrations are thought to maximize fitness by increasing food availability, reducing predation, or<br />

avoiding harsh environmental conditions (Brönmark et al. 2010).<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!